From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Lindner Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] dynamic gateway / hna / services Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 12:34:46 +0200 References: <20070803113132.f7ij8uf21xwsog8o@webmail.ddmesh.de> In-Reply-To: <20070803113132.f7ij8uf21xwsog8o@webmail.ddmesh.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708041234.46321.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi, > > I also like the idea of dynamically changing some parameters but on > > the other hand, what are the negative side-effects of restarting a > > daemon ? - A client connected to the daemon might temporary loose > > connection > > - Do you know others? > > I think the first point is important enough. see the statement above. at the moment we have more important issues to address than a broken debug client connection I think. But we happily accept patches if ou want to improve the current situation. Note: This problem is more complicated than it might seem. You will have to pay attention to various race conditions. > I have looked through the code and have seen that the HNA is simply > appended to > the end of a message. if we want to send other information a TLV structure > is needed (Tag-length-value). Batmand can ignore unknown Tags and is > still working in the network. At moment the whole network needs an > update at same time, because old batmand will interpret any data as HNA. > I hope I'm not wrong :) You are right. But why should we append random data to flood the network ? Why can't we use _existing_ and _working_ solutions for service discovery ? Did you read the discussion regarding this topic which was started by you ? Regards, Marek