From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Lindner Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] strange default routes Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:15:02 +0200 References: <6792.85.41.146.90.1192460098.squirrel@krisma.oltrelinux.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710161515.02658.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi, > the problem semms to be found and very much trivial. the recent > openWRT-release (or especially the ixp4xx-port ?!) as well as the rather > old slackware10.2 comes _without_ policy-routing compiled into the kernel. > figure this out ... an OS for embedded routers comes without advanced > routing capabilities ... nothing i've expected. nevertheless batman should > detect this and give a hint rather than trying to write to non-existent > routing-tables. this sounds odd. A check for policy routing seems to be a good idea but does anyone know how to check that ? Regards, Marek