From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Axel Neumann Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] routing problem? Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:43:28 +0100 References: <2bda28cd0711090623r2e7b8750g558aebab35247da0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2bda28cd0711090623r2e7b8750g558aebab35247da0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711101243.28980.axel@open-mesh.net> Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Freitag 09 November 2007, Stefano Scipioni wrote: > I'm testing batman 0.3 exp rv 777 > > traceroute give me a problem > > root@sala:~$ traceroute 10.0.1.1 > traceroute: can't find interface > root@sala:~$ ip route ls tab 66 > 10.1.5.104 dev ath0 proto static scope link src 10.1.5.102 > 10.1.5.130 via 10.1.5.104 dev ath0 proto static > 10.1.5.129 via 10.1.5.1 dev ath0 proto static > 10.1.5.1 via 10.1.5.104 dev ath0 proto static > root@sala:~$ ip route ls tab 65 > 10.0.1.0/24 via 10.1.5.1 dev ath0 proto static > root@sala:~$ traceroute 10.0.1.1 > traceroute: can't find interface > root@sala:~$ ping 10.0.1.1 > PING 10.0.1.1 (10.0.1.1): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: seq=0 ttl=61 time=9.119 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: seq=1 ttl=61 time=8.486 ms > > traceroute works If I utilize source address option. > What is my mistake? i think theres no mistake, busybox-traceroute is just to stupid to figure out the correct src ip. In my test, tcpdump showed that it uses the first (non-alias) address of the outgoing interface. No matter if the route to the destination specifies the src address or not. Did you use an alias interfaces for this scenrio? And even better, the traceroute on my notebook chooses the correct outgoing src address but unless i specify it also manually it does not work either. The reason is a corrupted udp checksum which is verified by the final destination of the packet. > > Also if one of nodes has no batman-exp running on it I can't reach it > from neighbours (I use batmand on ath0 interface, not an alias)? > Perhaps I have to use --no-unreachable-rule? For correct routing between batman-nodes and non-batman nodes you need to set routes manually. If a multi-homed node is involved with the same netmask on multiple interfaces then you must also specify the src address for the manual routing entry like: ip r add 10.0.1.1/32 dev ath0 src 10.1.5.102 And on the batman-node you must either HNA announce the ip of the non-batman node using -a (this will automaticall disable the unreachable rule to hit for the ip address of the non-batman node). Or, just as you suggested, launch batman with the --no-unreachable-rule. ciao, axel > > Stefano > _______________________________________________ > B.A.T.M.A.N mailing list > B.A.T.M.A.N@open-mesh.net > https://list.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n