From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Holger Levsen Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batmand in debian Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 20:12:01 +0100 References: <200712011234.13058.holger@layer-acht.org> <200712011839.28187.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> In-Reply-To: <200712011839.28187.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1373936.IW6dHIFuEl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200712012012.01657.holger@layer-acht.org> Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking --nextPart1373936.IW6dHIFuEl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi Marek, On Saturday 01 December 2007 18:39, Marek Lindner wrote: > great news ! Thanks to all people involved in that process. :-) Wesley did a lot :-) > > Which means, we can now prepare 0.3 for Debian/experimental, or to > > unstable if you you think that's better. > I think unstable would be fine for the moment or any objections ? Then 0.2 would be "gone".. as I understood you, you have these two branches= =20 for a reason... if not, let's go for 0.3~svn_revision in unstable. regards, Holger --nextPart1373936.IW6dHIFuEl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHUbIBUHLQNqxYNSARAvjXAJ9Bq3+ckyZ+DebkhRCcuutC0OIOzwCgoXka SS7W4aa6GQRyaW6TWAyity4= =ixjS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1373936.IW6dHIFuEl--