[B.A.T.M.A.N.] batmand in debian

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] batmand in debian

[Holger Levsen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 226 bytes --]

Hi,

batmand is now in Debian/unstable, see http://packages.qa.debian.org/batmand
:-)

Which means, we can now prepare 0.3 for Debian/experimental, or to unstable if 
you you think that's better.


regards,
	Holger

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batmand in debian

[Marek Lindner]

Hi,

> batmand is now in Debian/unstable, see
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/batmand

great news ! Thanks to all people involved in that process. :-)


> Which means, we can now prepare 0.3 for Debian/experimental, or to unstable
> if you you think that's better.

 I think unstable would be fine for the moment or any objections ?

Greetings,
Marek

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batmand in debian

[Holger Levsen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 523 bytes --]

Hi Marek,

On Saturday 01 December 2007 18:39, Marek Lindner wrote:
> great news ! Thanks to all people involved in that process. :-)

Wesley did a lot :-)

> > Which means, we can now prepare 0.3 for Debian/experimental, or to
> > unstable if you you think that's better.
>  I think unstable would be fine for the moment or any objections ?

Then 0.2 would be "gone".. as I understood you, you have these two branches 
for a reason... if not, let's go for 0.3~svn_revision in unstable.


regards,
	Holger

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batmand in debian

[Marek Lindner]

Hi,

> > > Which means, we can now prepare 0.3 for Debian/experimental, or to
> > > unstable if you you think that's better.
> >
> >  I think unstable would be fine for the moment or any objections ?
>
> Then 0.2 would be "gone".. as I understood you, you have these two branches
> for a reason... if not, let's go for 0.3~svn_revision in unstable.

yes - 0.3 is not stable yet. I'm not in a hurry. If you think it is better to 
go with experimental first I wont object to that. 
Another option would be to delay this question for a month or so. I know that 
during the CCC event (at the end of the yea)r a lot of testing and hacking is 
planned. Lets see where we are after that.

Greetings,
Marek

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batmand in debian

[Holger Levsen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 616 bytes --]

Hi,

On Sunday 02 December 2007 15:59, Marek Lindner wrote:
> yes - 0.3 is not stable yet. I'm not in a hurry. If you think it is better
> to go with experimental first I wont object to that.

It has the advantage, that we can keep 0.2 easily available.

> Another option would be to delay this question for a month or so. I know
> that during the CCC event (at the end of the yea)r a lot of testing and
> hacking is planned. Lets see where we are after that.

Hmmm. I'll be at the CCC and I want to run batman installed via apt there :-) 
So I guess I'll upload 0.3something...


regards,
	Holger

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]