From: Axel Neumann <axel@open-mesh.net>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] two-way-tunnel quirks
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 21:41:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200712012141.59334.axel@open-mesh.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200712011834.54327.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Hi,
perhaps this has something to do with the reduced maximum-transfer-unit (mtu)
which ist left for the tunnel interfaces. Since the one-way-tunnel do only
tunnel the upling-traffic but NOT tunnel the downlink traffic this is not a
problem when trying to connect to a intractable www server.
Did I understand you correct, that these problems only occurs when surfing to
a few webservers, but not to all webservers?
Can you try what happens if you reduce the mtu of the outgoing interface at
the upstream gateway (e.g. ifconfig ethX mtu 1400). I think there might be 3
possible results:
1) everything remains as before, there is another reason
2) the hotmai/msn/live.com or pop services are not reachable anymore from the
upstream gw. Then we have at least a hint.
3) Now these services also work inside the mesh. Maybe the icmp messages
which are supposed to communicate the path-mtu-problem were not correctly
transmitted from the tunnel interface but succeed from the upstream gw
interface to the server.
ciao,
axel
On Samstag 01 Dezember 2007, Marek Lindner wrote:
> > now i found an issue which i didn't relate with batman
> > first. I got several reports of users, hotmail/msn/live.com
> > not being accessible anymore...
> > Yesterday i found out theres also problems with some pop server
> > not beeing accessible, but everything works fine directly at the
> > upstream gw, without any batmand involved.
>
> Unfortunately, it is too few information to do anything about it. Could you
> describe your experiences in more detail. Here some questions on the way:
>
> - When did you notice the problem for the first time ?
> - Which revision was used ?
> - What exactely is your problem ?
> - Can you describe it in way that i can reproduce it ?
>
> Greetings,
> Marek
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> B.A.T.M.A.N mailing list
> B.A.T.M.A.N@open-mesh.net
> https://list.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-01 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-30 23:28 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] two-way-tunnel quirks Jan Hetges
2007-12-01 17:34 ` Marek Lindner
2007-12-01 20:41 ` Axel Neumann [this message]
2007-12-02 5:39 ` Jan Hetges
2007-12-06 3:18 ` Marek Lindner
2007-12-02 4:32 ` Jan Hetges
2007-12-02 18:54 ` Axel Neumann
2007-12-03 17:47 ` Predrag Balorda
2007-12-04 4:03 ` Jan Hetges
2007-12-04 9:05 ` Axel Neumann
2007-12-04 13:00 ` Jan Hetges
2007-12-04 15:05 ` Axel Neumann
2007-12-04 10:01 ` Axel Neumann
2007-12-04 12:37 ` Axel Neumann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200712012141.59334.axel@open-mesh.net \
--to=axel@open-mesh.net \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox