From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 22:32:16 -0600 From: Jan Hetges Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] two-way-tunnel quirks Message-ID: <20071202043216.GB3923@apoderado.ometepe.net> References: <20071130232852.GC3934@apoderado.ometepe.net> <200712011834.54327.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200712011834.54327.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking --VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 06:34:54PM +0100, Marek Lindner wrote: >=20 > > now i found an issue which i didn't relate with batman > > first. I got several reports of users, hotmail/msn/live.com > > not being accessible anymore... > > Yesterday i found out theres also problems with some pop server > > not beeing accessible, but everything works fine directly at the > > upstream gw, without any batmand involved. >=20 > Unfortunately, it is too few information to do anything about it. Could y= ou=20 > describe your experiences in more detail. Here some questions on the way: >=20 > - When did you notice the problem for the first time ? user reports for about 3 weeks > - Which revision was used ? probably rv777, i'm running batmand-exp only since then > - What exactely is your problem ? web-browsers say something like "hotmail/msn/live.com dropped the connection" > - Can you describe it in way that i can reproduce it ? A---B---C A: your computer B: bmxd_rv804 client node } }running 2-way-tunnel C: bmxd_rv804 gw node } and now try to browse www.hotmail.com, but i'm not sure if you can reproduce it, because the high latency (>640ms) of our sat-uplink might be also involved=20 cheers --Jan --VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHUjVQlTtvZdk47D4RAiiOAJ9HWtddx2ygsyTks9D41OoY1YQSkQCgg9Qj MtBsSlAIyw6S/HBPsRk/cSI= =63P8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4--