From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Lindner Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batmand in debian Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 15:59:30 +0100 References: <200712011234.13058.holger@layer-acht.org> <200712011839.28187.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <200712012012.01657.holger@layer-acht.org> In-Reply-To: <200712012012.01657.holger@layer-acht.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200712021559.30672.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi, > > > Which means, we can now prepare 0.3 for Debian/experimental, or to > > > unstable if you you think that's better. > > > > I think unstable would be fine for the moment or any objections ? > > Then 0.2 would be "gone".. as I understood you, you have these two branches > for a reason... if not, let's go for 0.3~svn_revision in unstable. yes - 0.3 is not stable yet. I'm not in a hurry. If you think it is better to go with experimental first I wont object to that. Another option would be to delay this question for a month or so. I know that during the CCC event (at the end of the yea)r a lot of testing and hacking is planned. Lets see where we are after that. Greetings, Marek