Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] two-way-tunnel quirks

[Jan Hetges <tran@ms20.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 930 bytes --]

Hi Axel
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:54:24PM +0100, Axel Neumann wrote:
> ...
> >
> > > - Can you describe it in way that i can reproduce it ?
> >
> >   A---B---C
> >
> > A: your computer
> >
> > B: bmxd_rv804  client node      }
> >                                  }running 2-way-tunnel
> > C: bmxd_rv804    gw node        }
> 
> I am just curious, can you confirm if the following correctly 
> describes the HNA/SNAT of your setup:
> 
> for the two-way-tunnel setup:
>  - you were doing SNAT at Cs' upstream interface AND at Bs' bat0 interface 
MASQUERADE 
> 
> for the one-way tunnel setup:
>  - you are only doing SNAT at Cs' upstream interface
no, i still do MASQUERADE also on Bs' bat0, because i was too lazy to
comment it out ;-)
>  - and additionally an HNA announcement by B for the address used by A
yes, but also with 2-way-tunnel (because i want net internal routing)

cheers

  --Jan


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]