public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Axel Neumann <axel@open-mesh.net>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] two-way-tunnel quirks
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 11:01:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200712041101.06161.axel@open-mesh.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071202043216.GB3923@apoderado.ometepe.net>

Hi,

On Sonntag 02 Dezember 2007, Jan Hetges wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 06:34:54PM +0100, Marek Lindner wrote:
> > > now i found an issue which i didn't relate with batman
> > > first. I got several reports of users, hotmail/msn/live.com
> > > not being accessible anymore...
> > > Yesterday i found out theres also problems with some pop server
> > > not beeing accessible, but everything works fine directly at the
> > > upstream gw, without any batmand involved.
> >
> > Unfortunately, it is too few information to do anything about it. Could
> > you describe your experiences in more detail. Here some questions on the
> > way:
> >
> > - When did you notice the problem for the first time ?
>
> user reports for about 3 weeks
>
> > - Which revision was used ?
>
> probably rv777, i'm running batmand-exp only since then
>
> > - What exactely is your problem ?
>
> web-browsers say something like "hotmail/msn/live.com dropped the
> connection"
>
> > - Can you describe it in way that i can reproduce it ?
>
>   A---B---C
>
> A: your computer
>
> B: bmxd_rv804  client node      }
>                                  }running 2-way-tunnel
> C: bmxd_rv804    gw node        }
>
> and now try to browse www.hotmail.com, but i'm not sure if
> you can reproduce it, because the high latency (>640ms) of
> our sat-uplink might be also involved

theres nothing you cannot do with linux:

on my upstream server:
|isix:~# tc qdisc add dev eth5 root netem delay 800ms

on my notebook:
|smart linux # ping -n google.de
|PING google.de (216.239.59.104) 56(84) bytes of data.
|64 bytes from 216.239.59.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=852 ms

the interesting:
|smart linux # ping -n msn.com
|PING msn.com (207.68.172.246) 56(84) bytes of data.
|--- msn.com ping statistics ---
|7 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 5998ms

|smart linux # ping -n live.com
|PING live.com (207.46.30.34) 56(84) bytes of data.
|--- live.com ping statistics ---
|7 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 5998ms

remove artificial delay again:
|isix:~# tc qdisc del dev eth5 root netem delay 800ms

still the problematic ones you mentioned do not reply to icmp pings.
|smart linux # ping -n live.com
|PING live.com (207.46.30.34) 56(84) bytes of data.
|--- live.com ping statistics ---
|4 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 2998ms


|smart linux # ping -n open-mesh.net
|PING open-mesh.net (88.198.145.69) 56(84) bytes of data.
|64 bytes from 88.198.145.69: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=29.4 ms


Still I could not yet reproduce the problem but I am quite sure
that this has something to do with the msn&co.coms' reluctance to 
respond to icmp messages.

ciao,
axel

>
> cheers
>
>   --Jan



  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-12-04 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-30 23:28 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] two-way-tunnel quirks Jan Hetges
2007-12-01 17:34 ` Marek Lindner
2007-12-01 20:41   ` Axel Neumann
2007-12-02  5:39     ` Jan Hetges
2007-12-06  3:18       ` Marek Lindner
2007-12-02  4:32   ` Jan Hetges
2007-12-02 18:54     ` Axel Neumann
2007-12-03 17:47       ` Predrag Balorda
2007-12-04  4:03       ` Jan Hetges
2007-12-04  9:05         ` Axel Neumann
2007-12-04 13:00           ` Jan Hetges
2007-12-04 15:05             ` Axel Neumann
2007-12-04 10:01     ` Axel Neumann [this message]
2007-12-04 12:37       ` Axel Neumann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200712041101.06161.axel@open-mesh.net \
    --to=axel@open-mesh.net \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox