From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Axel Neumann Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Quagga zebra API client for BATMAN Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:52:41 +0100 References: <200712271148.14121.holger@layer-acht.org> <200712310201.49542.acinonyxs@yahoo.gr> <200801181816.35869.acinonyxs@yahoo.gr> In-Reply-To: <200801181816.35869.acinonyxs@yahoo.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801200852.41541.axel@open-mesh.net> Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hello Vasilis, cool work. I have some questions: > I've also tried to calculate a metric based on link quality. Unfortunately, > I wasn't able to find a way to compare latency between two different > originators. Assuming information about the latency is available. I guess you would like to use it as a secondary input when calculating the metric. Do you know (or have any feeling) how problematic it can become if the indicated latency for a given route is changing very frequently (definitely much more often than the best next hop and related TTL). > Originators could only be compared based on packet loss which > isn't what we want because it would lead to having the same metric (1) for > all nodes if there isn't some packet loss present. So, we are staying for > the moment with the TTL approach with some adjustment to make it safer with > different TTL settings. I am not familiar with quagga. Why is it problematic to have several routes with the same metric. Or asked another way: There could also be several routes (to the same destination) with the same TTL. Why does this problem not exist in this case? > > I also want to point out an issue with batmand host routes and Quagga. > Although Quagga succesfully installs host routes, it doesn't treat them as > valid gateways if the associated interface isn't flaged as P-t-P. I don't > know if this is a bug or a feature but it renders all batmand second level > routes inactive. I added a workaround in zebra client which disables host > route installation. This means that you can use quagga zebra client only if > you have standard broadcast subnets. what is your definition of a standard broadcast subnet ? is it "POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST,NOARP,..." and /32 ? > > The attached patch is against latest stable BATMAN release (revsion 502). copied to http://downloads.open-mesh.net/batman/patches/quagga/ > > Regards, > Vasilis ciao, axel