From: GUSL <gfjl@ubbi.com>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] AHdemo mode
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:55:36 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804092255.36474.gfjl@ubbi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804100852.51052.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
El Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:52:50 Marek Lindner escribió:
> Hi,
>
> > I found this post : http://robin.forumup.it/about107-robin.html
> >
> > I like to hear opinions about this possible security issue.
>
> why do the security experts always find the same bug ? :D
>
> As far as I know the WPA encryption is not supposed to secure _all_ your
> traffic. It is supposed to encrypt the traffic between your notebook and
> your accesspoint.
>
> For meshing you need ad-hoc mode and in this mode you don't have a single
> authority to authenticate against. How should "mesh encryption" work - all
> nodes are "equal" ?
>
> If you want to secure your network traffic, please use the higher security
> layers as SSL or similar technologies. They do _proper_ end to end
> encryption. Even if the WPA would work your traffic is not secure as the
> internet gateway and all stations after it still could sniff your traffic.
>
> I would be very interested to hear from "williamruckman" what kind of
> packets he would inject to "capture all traffic or perform a
> man-in-the-middle attack". I suggest reading the "security considerations"
> section of this document first:
> https://www.open-mesh.net/batman/doc/draft-openmesh-b-a-t-m-a-n-00.txt
>
> Regards,
> Marek
> _______________________________________________
> B.A.T.M.A.N mailing list
> B.A.T.M.A.N@open-mesh.net
> https://list.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n
Thanks for your reply.
I hope I am not being annoying.
Obviously there are too many "security experts" out there.... :P
Regards,
GUSL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-10 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-09 23:52 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] AHdemo mode GUSL
2008-04-10 0:52 ` Marek Lindner
2008-04-10 1:55 ` GUSL [this message]
2008-04-10 2:23 ` Vinay Menon
2008-04-10 4:22 ` Marek Lindner
2008-04-10 6:04 ` bruno randolf
2008-04-10 6:59 ` Vinay Menon
2008-04-11 7:48 ` Simon Wunderlich
2008-04-10 4:12 ` Marek Lindner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-10 9:41 Marek Lindner
2008-04-10 9:51 ` elektra
2008-04-11 18:30 ` Aaron Kaplan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804092255.36474.gfjl@ubbi.com \
--to=gfjl@ubbi.com \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox