From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:39:28 -0600 From: Jan Hetges Message-ID: <20080421123928.GA3483@apoderado.ometepe.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] two radio nodes and alternative next hop Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi i'm running bmxd_rv972 for almost three months now, without any mayor problems :-)... thanks. what i recognized lately, on two nodes (the ones with more than one bmx interface), show alternativeNextHops, which are *NO*=20 alternative. It seems there gets some 'information' lost between the two IFs. I suppose that's a known issue ;-), any ideas how to=20 fix/workaround ? iirc, i saw once or twice a node "on the other interface" even listed as the bestNextHop. cheers --Jan --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIDIsAlTtvZdk47D4RAuzTAJ4kaM8igcwMFyGm0VME14nnBR2rIgCeL7WL vgm3/cHM8tR7/g8q0NkGPiU= =40m+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--