From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Lindner Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:01:31 +0800 References: <8c906fa50809100941y79bc2011nd234780ad7b5cd0@mail.gmail.com> <20080910193801.GA10777@pandem0nium> <8c906fa50809101400i4c30cff5geb16998e11d7c607@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8c906fa50809101400i4c30cff5geb16998e11d7c607@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200809111101.31420.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] BATGAT Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Thursday, 11. September 2008 05:00:59 Gustavo Lindberg wrote: > I am experimenting very frustrating issues with batgat. Currently i am > testing the last trunk of kamikaze on ubiquity NS2. Batmand dies quietly > with batgat loaded. I will prove the last kamikaze on two NS2 without > batgat and inform the bug if this error happen again. I think it would be intersting to find out why batmand dies. May be you could produce a core dump ? Indeed, we have a problem if the batman daemon dies without telling the module. What about adding a keep alive + timeout in the module ? Greetings, Marek