From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] Send TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST as response of
	TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:33:15 +0200
References: <20080924215939.GA9277@sven-desktop.lazhur.ath.cx>
	<6fd627b9bdd448cd88026446baddb8a5.squirrel@wm.ddmesh.de>
In-Reply-To: <6fd627b9bdd448cd88026446baddb8a5.squirrel@wm.ddmesh.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8734887.s9MdAdRfIX";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200809251133.19049.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n.open-mesh.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://list.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
	<mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@open-mesh.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://list.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n>
List-Post: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
List-Help: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@open-mesh.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://list.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
	<mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@open-mesh.net?subject=subscribe>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking <b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>

--nextPart8734887.s9MdAdRfIX
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 25 September 2008 11:12:11 Stephan Enderlein (Freifunk Dresden)=
=20
wrote:
> It seems that you are always replying to emails of a different thread.
> The information you send do not belong to my questions.
> I also have seen that you replay to other threads that is not related
> to the threads.
> Please create a new thread instead for you PATCH messages as it would
> keep the thread in correct order.
Sry, I haven't replied to any threads with my [PATCH] mails. Please check y=
our=20
mua and the mail headers of my [PATCH] mails. You will notice that there ar=
e=20
no In-Reply-To or References in them - just the usual stuff mutt creates fo=
r=20
"new" mails and the stuff mailman adds.

Best regards
	Sven Eckelmann

--nextPart8734887.s9MdAdRfIX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkjbWtsACgkQqQGwKVlMoDtyVwCgpvkVI651q6T6yEe4H6VJgW8i
EWYAoPDGxCXktwEWK3W9vNMIxR1a4xxw
=fwQl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart8734887.s9MdAdRfIX--