From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:19:25 +0200
References: <20080924215939.GA9277@sven-desktop.lazhur.ath.cx>
	<98ded638d254e60e1038e55af9dd7c1e.squirrel@wm.ddmesh.de>
	<200809261339.33036.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <200809261339.33036.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1432039.8GmALPbKli";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200809261419.28752.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
Subject: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] My patches don't reference you mails
Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n.open-mesh.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://list.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
	<mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@open-mesh.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://list.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n>
List-Post: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
List-Help: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@open-mesh.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://list.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
	<mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@open-mesh.net?subject=subscribe>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking <b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>

--nextPart1432039.8GmALPbKli
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 26 September 2008 13:39:30 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Friday 26 September 2008 13:19:19 Stephan Enderlein (Freifunk Dresden)
> > [...]
> > When I display the complete email header of you emails I have the
> > following line:
> > "In-Reply-To: <6fd627b9bdd448cd88026446baddb8a5.squirrel@wm.ddmesh.de>"
> > For some reason you are creating emails with that header entry instead
> > without it.
>
> Can you please say which mail you mean? I checked different [PATCH] mails
> from me (send by mailman back to me) and cannot find it. The only ones
> which have them are the the real answers to your mails - which off course
> have references to them.
>
> grep -rli "6fd627b9bdd448cd88026446baddb8a5.squirrel@wm.ddmesh.de" *|xargs
> grep Subject
> 1222335445.3922.Wd6Iu:2,S:Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] Send
> TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST as response of
>
> 1222334362.3922.FhPMA:2,RS:Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] Send
> TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST as response of
>
> 1222428286.3965.lxuDX:Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] Send
> TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST as response o

To have the same data please download
  https://list.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/2008-September.txt.gz
and search for
  Message-ID: <20080924215939.GA9277@sven-desktop.lazhur.ath.cx>
This is the first mail which is displayed as answer to your mail inside the=
=20
threaded archive output. Do you see anything which justifies that this mail=
 is=20
attached to your mail in the thread?

Now search for
  Message-ID: <6fd627b9bdd448cd88026446baddb8a5.squirrel@wm.ddmesh.de>
This is the mail you wrote that you think that I "answered" to your mail. D=
o=20
you find the In-Reply-To and References? I do - and this should be the only=
=20
real reason that your mail is a answer to my mail for a mail reader (and fo=
r=20
the archive output of mailman of course).

Best regards,
	Sven Eckelmann

--nextPart1432039.8GmALPbKli
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkjc004ACgkQqQGwKVlMoDtDxACfYmGw6HAXTomn76eHEscI09nF
WgsAniVU2eCQE1BTIohAdi37XVeGtHXn
=dRo/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1432039.8GmALPbKli--