From: Simon Wunderlich <simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] 0.3.1 rv1152 - some test results
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:07:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081128200700.GA25072@pandem0nium> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49303E38.1050001@web.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1195 bytes --]
Hello Chris,
just a short note: rev 1160 - 1162 should [tm] only be cosmetic changes.
We added some defines to avoid confusion in the routing code. Therefore
rev 1159 and rev 1162 should behave equally (assuming that no new bugs were
introduced ... ;] ).
best regards,
Simon
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 08:53:44PM +0200, Chris W. wrote:
> Hello Marek,
>
> with rv 1162 routing seems to be much better,
> all nodes and subnets are reachable.
>
> After some minutes I saw this error on 10.4.2.50:
> Jan 1 05:55:40 wgt634u_50 daemon.err batmand[7357]: Error - can't add
> throw route to 10.2.50.0/24 via 0.0.0.0 (table 68): File exists
>
> greetings,
> Chris
>
>
> >>>-3- previously announced networks are not deleted (8.106), the routing
> >>>table collects multiple entries for the same destination
> >>
> >>Thanks for the hint. Fixed in revision 1159.
> >>
> >Yes, no multiple entries anymore in 1161.
> >
> >The announced network of 2.72 gets lost after some minutes on all nodes.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> B.A.T.M.A.N mailing list
> B.A.T.M.A.N@open-mesh.net
> https://list.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n
>
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-28 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-26 23:30 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] 0.3.1 rv1152 - some test results Chris W.
2008-11-27 16:43 ` Marek Lindner
2008-11-28 17:51 ` Chris W.
2008-11-28 18:53 ` Chris W.
2008-11-28 20:07 ` Simon Wunderlich [this message]
2008-11-28 20:51 ` Simon Wunderlich
2008-11-28 22:31 ` Chris W.
2008-11-29 0:35 ` Marek Lindner
2008-11-30 22:43 ` Chris W.
2008-12-01 4:19 ` Marek Lindner
2008-12-02 8:54 ` Chris W.
2008-12-01 4:30 ` Marek Lindner
2008-12-05 11:41 ` Chris W.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081128200700.GA25072@pandem0nium \
--to=simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox