From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "P. Mazart" Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:22:15 +0100 References: <200903032126.57456.pmazart@web.de> <200903051155.16975.pmazart@web.de> <200903051914.02114.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> In-Reply-To: <200903051914.02114.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903051422.15547.pmazart@web.de> Sender: pmazart@web.de Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] =?utf-8?q?Hiding_Local_Topology_=E2=80=93_TTL?= Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hello & Thank's for your reply, Am Donnerstag, 5. M=C3=A4rz 2009 schrieb Marek Lindner: > This paper just mentions the possibilities - not all flavors > implement that feature. As far as I know bmx (batman-experimental) > supports it though. Now I'm completely stuck with BM's brands. :-) Can you say something about overhead and performance of BM in=20 kernelspace compared to the udp-userspace deamon? And devel-status of each of them? > [=E2=80=A6] The packets sent to the vis server are UDP packets [=E2=80=A6] Ahh. Great. Thank's for the information. Greetings, P.M.