From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "P. Mazart" <pmazart@web.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:20:49 +0100
References: <200903032126.57456.pmazart@web.de>
	<200903051422.15547.pmazart@web.de> <20090305135831.GA1563@WGT634U>
In-Reply-To: <20090305135831.GA1563@WGT634U>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200903111420.49535.pmazart@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: pmazart@web.de
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Hiding Local Topology ??? TTL
Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n.open-mesh.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.net/mm/options/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
	<mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@open-mesh.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n>
List-Post: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
List-Help: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@open-mesh.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
	<mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@open-mesh.net?subject=subscribe>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking <b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>

Hello again,

Am Donnerstag, 5. M=C3=A4rz 2009 schrieb Sven Eckelmann:
> Please read http://open-mesh.net/wiki/BranchesExplained to understand
> basic differences between the "brands".

Ok did it.
Obviously "batman" stands for an algorithm on one hand and=20
implementation on the other hand=E2=80=A6=20
Can you say why there are different userspace-implementations and what=20
their difference is? (=E2=80=9EExperimental is not Debian=E2=80=9C is what =
I know, yet.)

> If you would really compare batman-adv-kernelland and batmand then
> please ask again - I don't have any good numbers here, but maybe
> somebody else has.

Yes, I thought there might be differences due to the translation (e.g.)=20
to sockets inside the kernel when using batmand or something.

But as far as got to know now the originatorpacketsize of batmand=20
(=E2=89=8860bytes) is small compared to the sizes of olsr's anyway. (=E2=89=
=88500bytes=20
with 300 nodes(?))

Thanks for your help
P.M.