From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] What do you think of this result?
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:34:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903211634.46493.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49C49C1A.6050100@java-system.com>
On Saturday 21 March 2009 15:49:46 marco tozzini wrote:
> From batman debug output it seems batman station has a good view one to
> each other, but working on this systems is very annoying:
> ssh terminal has a wobbling response to commands
>
> Is this the behavior I shall expect from a good working mesh system?
Please keep in mind what batman is doing to obtain these results: It
broadcasts packets and receives broadcasts. From that it tries to give an
estimation about the networks status and the link conditions. Obviously, you
can't derive latency or bandwidth throughput from this information base.
Lets look at your fping test: Usually batman broadcasts are sent once a
second. While rebroadcasting a jitter is applied to reduce the probability of
collisions with other batman packets. When you run fping on 192.168.2.200/30
you will generate traffic that has a high probability of collisions which will
lead to different test results.
If you compare test mechanisms make sure they run under the same conditions
otherwise it does not make sense to draw conclusions from it. The batman TQ
value tells you how batman sees the link at this specific time - nothing more
or less. This is an approximation of the reality. If you have ideas how to
improve it let us know. Meanwhile, we can try to help getting your wifi up to
speed (see antonios mail). :-)
Regards,
Marek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-21 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-20 21:15 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] What do you think of this result? marco tozzini
2009-03-21 1:17 ` Marek Lindner
2009-03-21 7:49 ` marco tozzini
2009-03-21 7:58 ` Antonio Anselmi
2009-03-21 8:34 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
2009-03-21 8:53 ` Bastian Bittorf
2009-03-23 16:55 ` Marek Lindner
2009-03-25 21:40 ` marco tozzini
2009-03-25 22:17 ` L. Aaron Kaplan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-24 12:05 Marco Tozzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200903211634.46493.lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--to=lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox