From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Lindner Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 02:42:12 +0800 References: <278AF6CA06F13D4C9E9F69C7B9AB3B8302E8D24B@MBX21.stu.nus.edu.sg> <200905272329.46313.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <560c7c9a0905270839t768570bdo22a862ab31f8863c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <560c7c9a0905270839t768570bdo22a862ab31f8863c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905280242.13316.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] MultiRadio Batman Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Wednesday 27 May 2009 23:39:37 Benjamin Henrion wrote: > Let's say a packet comes from node A interface ath0 of node B, and > there is a route on node B for the packet to go to node C, route which > use the same interface ath0. In this case, you might want to add a > cost to hop over the same wireless interface. Ok, good idea. I quickly made a patch: http://www.open-mesh.net/changeset/1276 Feel free to test it. :-) Regards, Marek