From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Lindner Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:58:49 +0800 References: <278AF6CA06F13D4C9E9F69C7B9AB3B8302E8D251@MBX21.stu.nus.edu.sg> In-Reply-To: <278AF6CA06F13D4C9E9F69C7B9AB3B8302E8D251@MBX21.stu.nus.edu.sg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905291458.52132.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Multiradio Batman Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Thursday 28 May 2009 13:17:04 Kartik Muralidharan wrote: > But how would batman choose the next hop if at every node there are two > interfaces available. The ideal ofcourse would be > 11a->11b->11a->11b->11a on each hop. If all nodes have 2 interfaces its hard to predict whether it will be: 11a->11b->11a->11b->11a or 11b->11a->11b->11a->11b If the link qualities are all equal batman we choose the fastest path (lowest latency). Regards, Marek