From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:48:10 +0800 References: <20090714130926.GM19071@ma.tech.ascom.ch> <20090714132004.GN19071@ma.tech.ascom.ch> In-Reply-To: <20090714132004.GN19071@ma.tech.ascom.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907142248.10724.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] =?iso-8859-1?q?=5Bbatman-adv=5D_bitarray=2E=5Bch?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=5D_Linux_coding_style=09cleanup?= Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Tuesday 14 July 2009 21:20:04 Andrew Lunn wrote: > What are peoples opinion about this? Should i spend a little time > cleaning up all the files? Some code needs refactoring a little, to > reducing the nesting, creating more helper functions, but mostly its > white space changes. However such changes can cause pain when trying > to merge in other work people who diff's are against before the > cleanup. Does anybody have any major patches? I have a major patch myself which I did not upload yet. It aims to improve the routing over multiple interfaces and thus touches quite some files. I'd rather test this stuff a bit longer before I screw up everyones routing. ;-) So, in my opinion there is not need to hesitate. Cleanup is a good idea. Regards, Marek