From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:54:13 +0800 References: <8c906fa50907160755g41d2e437m11fa02c7fdde8cfb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8c906fa50907160755g41d2e437m11fa02c7fdde8cfb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907172154.13655.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] VIS labels Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi, > Also, which is the general criteria to know from which number, that > the output shows, is considered a good, regular, bad or "imposible to > use" link? the number gives information about the link quality as batman measures it. 1.00 means 100% link quality, 2.00 means 50%, etc. Basically the idea is that the number tells you how many packets you need to send in order to get a single successful transmission. HNA are announced networks which do not run batman. The criteria for a good / bad / regular / etc link is rather subjective and depends on your demands. Do you need high throughput or just a few bytes per week ? A live video stream over a link which looses more than 50% of the packets requires quite some patience. ;-) Regards, Marek