From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:54:37 +0800 References: <20090826064151.GE21827@ma.tech.ascom.ch> In-Reply-To: <20090826064151.GE21827@ma.tech.ascom.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200908261554.37200.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] List policy for none subscribers Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi, > This is contrary to what the wiki says: > > http://open-mesh.org/wiki/MailingList > > You can subscribe to our Mailing List here. You can also send an > E-Mail without subscription to b.a.t.m.a.n@=E2=80=A6, but note that this > message will have to be accepted manually (and this can take some > time). the wiki is obviously wrong here. I see 2 options: 1) Correcting the wiki. 2) Finding people that are willing to handle the moderator requests. > 1) Make the batman list open for none subscribers to post to. That will bring a lot of SPAM to our list. Last time I checked we got 25.00= 0=20 SPAM mails in less than 3 days. Moderator requests could be the right=20 compromise if somebody deals with the requests. > 2) Create a batman-adv list which is open and we use that for all > discussion about kernel work. We always can create more mailing lists but I don't have the feeling we hav= e=20 that much traffic to justify another mailing list. Or what do you think ? > As a side issue, i'm not sure batman-adv is the right name for > mainline. In the context of the batman project, it makes sense, but > from the perspective of mainline, this is the first version of batman, > and maybe we cannot justify the advanced. Yeah, maybe you are right. Regards, Marek