From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 01:57:52 +0800 References: <4AA34865.9000203@rsm-freilassing.de> <200909072102.57854.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <4AA50D60.9050605@rsm-freilassing.de> In-Reply-To: <4AA50D60.9050605@rsm-freilassing.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909090157.53099.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems with Gateway-Selection without option -g Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Monday 07 September 2009 21:40:48 Michael Rack wrote: > The interface where batman is running on have MTU 1460 (Standard > Ethernet - UDP VPN Overload) on HOST #1. > The interface where batman is running on have MTU 1500 (Standard > Ethernet) on HOST #2. Ok, that is what I expected. Batman will take the 29 Bytes it needs from the given MTU. > Yes, the iptables-command does the trick for me. This iptalbes-filter > was known before. I added the filter to the mangle-table as the problem > occurs. Ok, I'll make a patch to let batman handle this automatically. Thanks for bringing this up. > Correct. I've added some rules with "to any", and this does the trick. > In addition i use my own policy-routing-script, because the "throw" > event makes the routing-table a little fuzzy. Now i have only two > routing-tables "batman_hosts" and "batman_networks". In my > policy-routing-script i do the seperation between both tables. You will need the throw routes as soon as you use the tunneling. > My policy-routing-script is attached. Nice - happy to see it in action. :-) Regards, Marek