From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 03:27:53 +0800 References: <200909031406.49008.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <200909291814.53591.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> <5161afcd0909292239h63defcc8o6d55b3b9cc1fbfd8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5161afcd0909292239h63defcc8o6d55b3b9cc1fbfd8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200910010327.53365.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mailing list migration (was: development flow) Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Wednesday 30 September 2009 13:39:21 Jacob Marble wrote: > Just looked at the VGER website, and they use majordomo. I don't know > much about these things; can mailman data be imported to majordomo? A > quick look around reveals no email addresses to contact them, other > than some that seem to be spambot honeypots. > > What do we need in order to make a decision? I would like to get this > transition happening soon so that real work can move forward. Ok, I feel a consensus that the open-mesh domain is not that important compared to having only one list. Personally, I don't think paying for a list is a good solution because sooner or later that will become an issue (even if it is not much money). Other than that I'm fine with every list you think is best. We should be able to somehow import the existing users (I can provide a list of mail addresses as a text file) and we should have archives somewhere. Regards, Marek