From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:34:04 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn Message-ID: <20091005063404.GF16067@lunn.ch> References: <20091004174127.GB3685@lunn.ch> <20091004.171221.67525397.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091004.171221.67525397.davem@davemloft.net> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] VGER mailing list request Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Miller Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net, postmaster@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 05:12:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Andrew Lunn > Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:41:27 +0200 > > > Is likely acceptance in staging sufficient for "...for which their > > upstream acceptance is imminent."? > > A lot of code doesn't make it past staging, and gets kicked right back > out of the staging tree instead of being moved to a final resting > place in the kernel tree. > > So staging inclusion doesn't really mean much, an so upstream > acceptance isn't imminent just because you get your code into staging > :-) Hi David Thanks for the reply. We will keep looking else where then for a list server. Once the code hits staging i will let you know so you can review it if you like. Thanks Andrew