From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Fwd: Re: Debian extra modules
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:02:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091006140218.GF6646@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200910062127.42925.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
> The postifx setup is quite simple at the moment: It rejects all unknown /
> unregistered mail. Greylisting is not in place yet. I quickly ran pflogsumm to
> give you an impression:
>
> Per-Day Traffic Summary
> date received delivered deferred bounced rejected
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sep 27 2009 110 107 153 16 4874
> Sep 28 2009 170 855 298 56 6894
> Sep 29 2009 229 1235 379 90 6757
> Sep 30 2009 176 525 420 38 7477
> Oct 1 2009 187 222 377 20 7913
> Oct 2 2009 132 132 414 17 8086
> Oct 3 2009 112 117 374 18 7790
> Oct 4 2009 128 658 294 42 6158
> Oct 5 2009 243 1634 509 97 7657
I don't understand these figures. Ah, this is for the complete mail
server. That explains why there was say 128 received on Oct 4, yet
only a handful in the list archive.
> But I tend to agree with you: We might have to face the fact that we
> have to improve the SPAM filter on our end and open the list. As a
> first step we could install greylisting and have a bunch of
> moderators to see how that goes.
Do you at least have spamassassin running? It would be interesting to
see how many of the rejected emails spamassassin also decided were
spam. Could you configure postfix to keep a copy of the rejected. I
can then manually perform some tests with spamassassin and see how
good it is.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-06 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-06 11:28 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Fwd: Re: Debian extra modules Holger Levsen
2009-10-06 11:55 ` Sven Eckelmann
2009-10-06 13:27 ` Marek Lindner
2009-10-06 13:52 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-10-06 14:02 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2009-10-06 15:11 ` Marek Lindner
2009-10-06 17:12 ` Jacob Marble
2009-10-06 17:37 ` Sven Eckelmann
2009-10-06 18:10 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-10-07 14:56 ` Marek Lindner
2009-10-06 11:59 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-10-20 10:04 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " Sven Eckelmann
2009-10-20 10:35 ` Holger Levsen
2009-10-29 13:15 ` Sven Eckelmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091006140218.GF6646@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox