From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 20:10:11 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn Message-ID: <20091006181011.GG6646@lunn.ch> References: <200910061328.04894.holger@layer-acht.org> <200910061355.49409.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> <200910062127.42925.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <200910061937.28427.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200910061937.28427.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Fwd: Re: Debian extra modules Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking > I never feel real happy about the filtering of spamassassines > bayesian analysis as it marks important mails for me as spam from > time to time. You are not forced to use the bayesian analysis part of spamassassin. It has lots of there methods for detecting spam as well as Bayesian. Andrew