From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:56:39 +0800
References: <200910061328.04894.holger@layer-acht.org>
	<200910062127.42925.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
	<200910061937.28427.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <200910061937.28427.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200910072256.39230.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Fwd: Re: Debian extra modules
Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net>
List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n.lists.open-mesh.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.net/mm/options/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
	<mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n>
List-Post: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net>
List-Help: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
	<mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@lists.open-mesh.net?subject=subscribe>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking <b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net>

On Wednesday 07 October 2009 01:37:25 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> Sry, doesn't want to upset you, but wanted to say that batgat isn't a
>  complete solution like batman-adv, but an extension to reduce the load on
>  the gateway. I don't think that it would hurt at the moment to leave it as
>  it is. Have not attended Linux Plumber Conf 2009 - so don't know what was
>  discussed there. As co-maintainer (Holger is the actual maintainer) of
>  that package in Debian it doesn't hurt me at the moment.

Don't worry - I did not feel offended at all. :)
Ok, then we leave it untouched.

 
> I categorized them in my head under todo because nothing of it is currently
> visible to the user. So some parts could be marked as "put them in the
>  right place".

I think we should maintain a wiki page about the progress, so that others can 
easily follow. What do you think ?


> Lets hope that greylisting would do a good job here as it is quite easy to
> setup (just done that for exim using greylistd - so cannot say that it is
>  also that easy for postfix, but there is a package called postgrey). I
>  never feel real happy about the filtering of spamassassines bayesian
>  analysis as it marks important mails for me as spam from time to time.

I just installed & configured postgrey. Let's see how that goes in the next 
days and then we can try to open the list ?!

Regards,
Marek