From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net
Cc: olsr-users@lists.olsr.org, jerryw@uow.edu.au,
Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>,
babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org, brett_hagelstein@uow.edu.au,
mehrana@uow.edu.au
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] A peer-reviewed assessment of OLSR, BATMAN and Babel
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:42:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911071842.08599.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871vkbzd6s.fsf@trurl.pps.jussieu.fr>
On Saturday 07 November 2009 03:05:31 Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> I've just come upon an interesting paper that experimentally compares
> the performance of OLSR, BATMAN and Babel.
>
> Real-world Performance of Current Proactive Multi-hop Mesh
> Protocols. M. Abolhasan, B. Hagelstein, J. C.-P. Wang.
>
>
> http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1747&context=infopapers
Very interesting analysis - thanks for sharing this with us.
> 4. They ran the routing daemons with the default parameters. This means
> that BATMAN ran with an OGM interval of 1 second, while Babel used
> a Hello interval of 4 seconds. It would have been interesting to see
> the results with similar parameters.
Although I get your point, you probably share my belief in default options,
hence it is the right thing to compare. Useful defaults are the first step
towards a working protocol. ;)
Cheers,
Marek
PS: You might or might have not noticed that our list now is open for everyone
to post (without prior registration).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-07 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-06 19:05 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] A peer-reviewed assessment of OLSR, BATMAN and Babel Juliusz Chroboczek
2009-11-06 22:55 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Babel-users] " Henning Rogge
2009-11-07 10:42 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
2009-11-07 16:42 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Olsr-users] " Juliusz Chroboczek
2009-11-07 23:35 ` L. Aaron Kaplan
2009-11-08 1:08 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2009-11-08 8:15 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Babel-users] " Henning Rogge
2009-11-09 4:46 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " Dr. Mehran Abolhasan
2009-11-09 9:07 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Babel-users] " Henning Rogge
2009-11-09 17:06 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " Juliusz Chroboczek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200911071842.08599.lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--to=lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net \
--cc=babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org \
--cc=brett_hagelstein@uow.edu.au \
--cc=jch@pps.jussieu.fr \
--cc=jerryw@uow.edu.au \
--cc=mehrana@uow.edu.au \
--cc=olsr-users@lists.olsr.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox