public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2] [batman-adv] Removing the big batman lock
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:21:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912031421.28772.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091203131150.GA7795@lunn.ch>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 969 bytes --]

Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > It seems to deadlock according to
> > 
> > https://lists.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/2009-December/001938.ht
> >ml
> >
> > Patch was modified by Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> to apply
> > cleanly against r1490.
> 
> Is this just modification so that it cleanly applies? Or does it also
> fix the deadlock?
No, deadlock isn't fixed yet. Just was nerved that it didn't apply when I 
wanted to test it. :)

And to the lockdep stuff. It is a real nice feature (I used it partly when 
debugging another kernel module), but as I noticed the mathematical 
correctness check is disabled on uml and cannot be enabled due to some 
dependency problems. :(

It is real a problem because uml is a preemption-less uniprocessor kernel and 
thus the spinlocks are just NOPs - so it is quite useless for any debugging of 
them. So back to the "lets crash my working machine" and/or qemu-based tests.

Best regards,
	Sven

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-03 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-29 20:09 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] Removing the big batman lock Simon Wunderlich
2009-11-30 10:09 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-12-13 21:17   ` Simon Wunderlich
2009-12-03  1:31 ` Linus Lüssing
2009-12-03  6:00   ` Andrew Lunn
2009-12-04 17:39     ` Sven Eckelmann
2009-12-03 12:13 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2] [batman-adv] " Simon Wunderlich
2009-12-03 13:11   ` Andrew Lunn
2009-12-03 13:21     ` Sven Eckelmann [this message]
2009-12-04 13:55   ` Sven Eckelmann
2009-12-05 15:27   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv3] " Simon Wunderlich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200912031421.28772.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
    --to=sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox