Ah, sorry, and skip the functions.c-part please, I had submitted a
seperate patch for that here already.

Cheers, Linus

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:58:35PM +0100, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> your patch seems to work pretty well here, tested it with 9
> batman-nodes in the same room. Nevertheless I found a couple of
> smaller bugs in there:
> - batctl segfaults, if "batctl vis" has no following argument
> - batctl now displays the help-page in certain situations where we
>   don't want it to
> - batctl ommits the first TQ tupel
> The attached patch for your patch should fix these issues :).
> 
> And I wanted to ask, what do you think about unifying the specific
> help output? For instance having this "Usage: ..."-header and the
> alignment for the following items the same way as it is done for
> other batctl commands as well.
> 
> Cheers, Linus
> 
> PS:
> Hmm, I'm also missing a couple of link/TQ entries already in the
> unified /proc/../vis. The 9 nodes in the same room should be able
> to see each other - the originator table on those nodes is also
> saying so. But I think I had seen this before without your patch,
> the problems has to be somewhere else. I'm attaching a batctl-vis-
> and proc-vis-output of the setup here too, just in case someone
> might spot some (more) parsing mistakes.