public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Changeset 1519
@ 2009-12-31 18:37 Gus Wirth
  2009-12-31 19:12 ` Gus Wirth
  2009-12-31 20:56 ` Sven Eckelmann
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gus Wirth @ 2009-12-31 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: b.a.t.m.a.n

I'm looking at changeset 1519 and have a question about the patch to
routing.c

On line 158 there is:

if (neigh_node)

but later at line 179 there is:

if (!neigh_node)

for essential the same functionality.

Am I confused or is one of these wrong (most likely the first one)?

Gus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Changeset 1519
  2009-12-31 18:37 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Changeset 1519 Gus Wirth
@ 2009-12-31 19:12 ` Gus Wirth
  2009-12-31 20:56 ` Sven Eckelmann
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gus Wirth @ 2009-12-31 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: b.a.t.m.a.n

On 12/31/2009 10:37 AM, Gus Wirth wrote:
> I'm looking at changeset 1519 and have a question about the patch to
> routing.c
> 
> On line 158 there is:
> 
> if (neigh_node)
> 
> but later at line 179 there is:
> 
> if (!neigh_node)
> 
> for essential the same functionality.
> 
> Am I confused or is one of these wrong (most likely the first one)?

Never mind. It was fixed in 1520.

Gus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Changeset 1519
  2009-12-31 18:37 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Changeset 1519 Gus Wirth
  2009-12-31 19:12 ` Gus Wirth
@ 2009-12-31 20:56 ` Sven Eckelmann
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sven Eckelmann @ 2009-12-31 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 442 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 10:37:29AM -0800, Gus Wirth wrote:
> I'm looking at changeset 1519 and have a question about the patch to
> routing.c
> 
> On line 158 there is:
> 
> if (neigh_node)
> 
> but later at line 179 there is:
> 
> if (!neigh_node)
> 
> for essential the same functionality.
> 
> Am I confused or is one of these wrong (most likely the first one)?

Please also look at 1520 and 1524.

Best regards,
	Sven

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-31 20:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-31 18:37 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Changeset 1519 Gus Wirth
2009-12-31 19:12 ` Gus Wirth
2009-12-31 20:56 ` Sven Eckelmann

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox