From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] network down timeout
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:39:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201001151039.55775.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5522db2e1001141832q5b98ffa4o1d12f8ecfa0bcc08@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday 15 January 2010 10:32:46 ecfu wrote:
> Is there something special about this number?
>
> If I need a faster response say 1 minute or even 30 seconds, is that a bad
> idea?
I'd be interested to understand why you think a smaller number would be
beneficial.
Regards,
Marek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-15 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-14 13:40 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] network down timeout ecfu
2010-01-14 20:03 ` Andrew Lunn
2010-01-15 2:32 ` ecfu
2010-01-15 2:39 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
2010-01-15 14:34 ` ecfu
2010-01-15 15:57 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201001151039.55775.lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--to=lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox