From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:57:41 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn Message-ID: <20100115155741.GF24649@lunn.ch> References: <5522db2e1001140540p7af82ba9gd52b375d54a2441d@mail.gmail.com> <20100114200359.GB24649@lunn.ch> <5522db2e1001141832q5b98ffa4o1d12f8ecfa0bcc08@mail.gmail.com> <201001151039.55775.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <5522db2e1001150634n26330e21l3075fffd81966090@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5522db2e1001150634n26330e21l3075fffd81966090@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] network down timeout Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:34:08AM -0500, ecfu wrote: > Because I am dealing with rapidly changing networks, like to the point where > applications could be complete in less than 3 minutes This still does not explain why the entry is a problem. Please could you explain in a bit more detail what you think the problem is? Thanks Andrew