From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:07:38 +0800 References: <20100118112706.91160@gmx.net> <201001182138.32432.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <20100119074334.275290@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20100119074334.275290@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201001192007.38210.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv on different archs Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Tuesday 19 January 2010 15:43:34 Juha Yl=F6nen wrote: > Ah yes, the instructions were actually were in the repository version of > the README file, but not in my version of the sources. The sources I have > the README is dated 07-11-2009, should I try later version? Well, the README that is part of the source package matches the sources you= =20 have. The trunk README might have changed since the last release ... > The log on the laptop side is pretty sparse: > [23707.971949] batman-adv: B.A.T.M.A.N. advanced 0.2 (compatibility versi= on > 8) loaded [23727.025361] batman-adv: Adding interface: wlan0 > [23727.028964] batman-adv: Interface activated: wlan0 > [23727.028983] batman-adv: Creating new local hna entry: de:ba:6c:f3:8d:53 > [23728.028287] batman-adv: Sending own packet (originator > 00:22:fa:dc:9a:ce, seqno 1, TQ 255, TTL 50, IDF off) on interface wlan0 > [00:22:fa:dc:9a:ce] [23729.008099] batman-adv: Sending own packet > (originator 00:22:fa:dc:9a:ce, seqno 2, TQ 255, TTL 50, IDF off) on > interface wlan0 [00:22:fa:dc:9a:ce] [23729.988106]=20 > > i.e. no sign of any other packages than own. On the device side the log is > in the same format as the one I sent yesterday. I'll try with the latest > version from the repository next. It confirmed what we saw in the other logs: This device (the laptop?) does = not=20 see the packets from the other side, therefore the protocol correctly assum= es =20 a dead link. There might be 2 reasons: either the wifi layer does not reall= y=20 work or batman-adv drops the packets without any further warning.=20 You can try the latest trunk and/or run batctl/wireshark on the laptop to=20 deep-inspect the packets. Feel free to share the logs with us. Regards, Marek