From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:19:13 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Juha_Yl=F6nen=22?= In-Reply-To: <20100122182619.GA6956@pandem0nium> Message-ID: <20100124211913.37820@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20100119145806.275330@gmx.net> <20100121141227.319490@gmx.net> <4B588C35.2020409@gmail.com> <201001211932.13914.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> <20100122182619.GA6956@pandem0nium> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv on different archs Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:26:19 +0100 > Von: Simon Wunderlich > > maybe just an idea, but could it be that we have a regression from the skb > patch that some skb headers are wrong? > > An idea would be to compare the behaviour with the batman-adv 0.2 release > or an revision < 1517, which still uses raw sockets instead of working > directly on the skb. Hi, I've been trying out with 0.2 release and with latest trunk, with same behaviour. -Juha -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser