From: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Fixing wrap-around bug in vis
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:04:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003121004.56182.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100312000931.GB13786@Linus-Debian>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1276 bytes --]
Linus Lüssing wrote:
> Sorry still does not seem to work :). Despite testing it on a
> setup in batman itself I also tested it with a small c program
> (which does not work as expected either):
But your version works? I would really doubt that when we do the same. The
macro will only replace the thing and we would have the same formular in that
situation.
> -----
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
>
> #define seq_before(x,y) ((x - y) > 1 << 7 + 8 * (sizeof(x) - 1))
> #define seq_after(x,y) ((y - x) >= 1 << 7 + 8 * (sizeof(x) - 1))
>
> int main() {
> uint8_t old = 0;
> uint8_t new = 1;
> if (!seq_after(new,old))
> printf("foobar\n");
>
> return 0;
> }
> -----
> $ ./test
> foobar
> $
Now it gets real cruel, but who cares... C++ wasn't accept in the kernel, so we have
to deal with it using some GNUish stuff.
#define seq_before(x,y) ({typeof(x) _dummy = (x - y); \
_dummy > 1u << (7u + 8u * (sizeof(_dummy) - 1u));})
#define seq_after(x,y) ({typeof(x) _dummy = (y - x); \
_dummy >= 1u << (7u + 8u * (sizeof(_dummy) - 1u));})
Thanks for testing (I never did it :) ) and please test that one.
Best regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-12 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-09 23:03 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] vis: (sometimes) missing entries Linus Lüssing
2010-03-11 16:38 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Fixing wrap-around bug in vis Linus Lüssing
2010-03-11 17:14 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-03-11 21:19 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-03-11 21:41 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-03-11 22:06 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-03-11 22:33 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-03-11 23:04 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-03-12 0:09 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-03-12 7:45 ` Andrew Lunn
2010-03-12 9:04 ` Sven Eckelmann [this message]
2010-03-12 15:16 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-03-12 19:09 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-03-14 15:46 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-03-14 17:51 ` Marek Lindner
2010-03-12 20:57 ` Simon Wunderlich
2010-03-12 21:06 ` Sven Eckelmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003121004.56182.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
--to=sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox