From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:48:52 +0800 References: <1269055908-20369-1-git-send-email-linus.luessing@web.de> <1269055908-20369-2-git-send-email-linus.luessing@web.de> <20100320093615.GA3753@Linus-Debian> In-Reply-To: <20100320093615.GA3753@Linus-Debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003202248.52191.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/2] batman-adv: Fix aggregation direct-link bug Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi, thanks for your patch and for testing mine. I applied both of them. > And there are two more things I'm wondering about: > - Why should primary interface OGMs from a different originator > which already travelled over 49 hops not be aggregated to other > primary interface OGMs? > - Why should secondary interface OGMs from neighbours not be > aggregated on our own, neighboring secondary interface OGMs? > As far as I can tell, those two combinations are not being > aggregated at the moment. Is there a reason why they shouldn't? Well, well - we happily apply more of your patches. ;-) Cheers, Marek