From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 17:44:28 +0800 References: <201003241252.18954.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <20100401172810.GA28422@Linus-Debian> In-Reply-To: <20100401172810.GA28422@Linus-Debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201004031744.28756.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] reorganized kernel interface patches (version 3) Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hey, thanks a lot for testing and your feedback! > had a look at your patches and found a bug which causes a kernel panic > (see attachement). I can reproduce this with the following veeery > complicated routine :): > --- > ifconfig bat0 down && ifconfig bat0 up > --- I tried that but it does not crash at my end. Maybe you did more than you think to provoke this crash ? In my test setup I have 2 nodes with 3 interfaces each. I ran your command several times without seeing any odd behaviour. > The adding and deleting of mesh-port interfaces seems to work fine, > the new, more dynamic interface is awesome :). And I just was > wondering if you forgot about adding something like "batctl if del > all" or did you schedule this for another patch? Actually, a "delete all" was not on my agenda. > Also some additional abbrevations for add/del would be nice (just > "a" and "d" for instance). Should be no problem - I'll add it before submitting the patches. Regards, Marek