From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 00:21:25 +0200 From: Simon Wunderlich Message-ID: <20100404222125.GA9216@pandem0nium> References: <56afad541003221528w13e61637tbfdd0e0890181d88@mail.gmail.com> <20100323063231.GG15823@lunn.ch> <20100325230854.GA10841@Linus-Debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100325230854.GA10841@Linus-Debian> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Minor change in vis.c Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey guys, thank you very much for reporting and discussing, just committed a fix (r1617 and r1618). best regards, Simon On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:08:54AM +0100, Linus L=C3=BCssing wrote: > > So it looks like we need a field width of 3, not 2. > Ah, sorry forgot about the rest of the mail, sorry :). So that's > probably what you meant, right? > >=20 > > BTW: Is a TQ =3D=3D 0 possible? batctl does not prevent the / 0 from > > happening. > Hmm, no, shouldn't be possible, as in vis packets a tq-value of > "0" is an HNA entry (and the dest-field filled with 0x000000000000) >=20 > Cheers, Linus > >=20 > > Andrew > >=20 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAku5EOUACgkQrzg/fFk7axbHrwCdHCR6/5gEZ10mPXOQU8Ht6YqA 4iIAoMlgLmDBXRiRxm1FXKfxpEeCOTZ8 =9IJ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--