* [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
@ 2010-04-01 22:54 Clemens John
2010-04-02 6:52 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-04-02 16:00 ` Marek Lindner
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Clemens John @ 2010-04-01 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b.a.t.m.a.n
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2105 bytes --]
Hi,
I use batman advanced ("# batctl o" says "B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 0.2.1-beta r1578")
on OpenWrt trunk and I have the following problem:
I have a wlan meshnetwork in ahdemo mode which uses batman. The meshnetwork is
used by clients without batman and therefore I have another network on the
same wifi device in ad mode which is bridged with bat0.
The bridge is in the network 10.18.1.0/24.
I think its like described in http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv-quick-
start-guide
The problem is, that I have a vpn network on tap0 (10.18.0.0/24) and I dont
know how I can link this two networks/interfaces to each other with batman.
I tried to assign tap0 to batman, but this doesnt work.
I want to be able to ping hosts that uses batman in the vpn and in the wlan
network. How can I do this?
My configs look like this:
---------------
/etc/conf/network
---------------
config 'interface' 'loopback'
option 'ifname' 'lo'
option 'proto' 'static'
option 'ipaddr' '127.0.0.1'
option 'netmask' '255.0.0.0'
config 'interface' 'lan'
option 'proto' 'dhcp'
option 'ifname' 'eth0'
config 'interface' 'mesh'
option 'type' 'bridge'
option 'ifname' 'ath0 bat0'
option 'proto' 'static'
option 'ipaddr' '10.18.1.101'
option 'netmask' '255.255.255.0'
config 'interface' 'vpn'
option 'proto' 'none'
option 'ifname' 'tap0'
---------------
/etc/conf/wireless
---------------
config wifi-device wifi0
option type atheros
option channel 6
config wifi-iface
option device wifi0
option mode ahdemo
option bssid 02:CA:FF:EE:BA:BE
config wifi-iface
option device wifi0
option mode ap
option ssid oldenburg.freifunk.net
---------------
/etc/conf/batman-adv-kernelland
---------------
config batman-adv-kernelland general
option interface 'ath1 tap0'
option originator_interval
option log_level
thanks
Floh1111
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
2010-04-01 22:54 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv Clemens John
@ 2010-04-02 6:52 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-04-02 10:17 ` Clemens John
2010-04-02 16:00 ` Marek Lindner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Linus Lüssing @ 2010-04-02 6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3564 bytes --]
Hi Floh1111,
Welcome to the B.A.T.M.A.N. mailing list :).
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 12:54:02AM +0200, Clemens John wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use batman advanced ("# batctl o" says "B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 0.2.1-beta r1578")
> on OpenWrt trunk and I have the following problem:
>
> I have a wlan meshnetwork in ahdemo mode which uses batman. The meshnetwork is
> used by clients without batman and therefore I have another network on the
> same wifi device in ad mode which is bridged with bat0.
> The bridge is in the network 10.18.1.0/24.
>
> I think its like described in http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv-quick-
> start-guide
Yes, this configuration looks quite good already if I didn't miss
anything and if you're having wifi cards with an atheros chip.
What kind of devices are you using?
>
> The problem is, that I have a vpn network on tap0 (10.18.0.0/24) and I dont
> know how I can link this two networks/interfaces to each other with batman.
> I tried to assign tap0 to batman, but this doesnt work.
>
> I want to be able to ping hosts that uses batman in the vpn and in the wlan
> network. How can I do this?
Ok, now I have some more questions already :). What do you want to
gain with this vpn exactly, merging a couple of mesh clouds or
getting the network behind the vpn into the mesh? What is
creating this vpn right now, how are the two sites connected with
each other (over network identified with 'lan' I guess?).
Does pinging inside of the vpn itself without any mesh work?
From the configuration now, it looks like you're having another
batman-adv on the other side of the vpn as you've assigned tap0 to
batman. So keep in mind that the recipient on the other side of the tunnel
will get batman-adv ethernet frames only which encapsulate the
payload - there has to be a batman-adv on the other side to unwrap
the IP packets again.
And if there is a batman-adv on the other side of the tunnel, make
sure the vpn itself is transporting whole ethernet frames and not
only ip packets (in tinc this is "switched" mode for instance or
in OpenVPN having "dev tap" and not "dev tun").
Cheers, Linus
>
> My configs look like this:
>
> ---------------
> /etc/conf/network
> ---------------
> config 'interface' 'loopback'
> option 'ifname' 'lo'
> option 'proto' 'static'
> option 'ipaddr' '127.0.0.1'
> option 'netmask' '255.0.0.0'
>
> config 'interface' 'lan'
> option 'proto' 'dhcp'
> option 'ifname' 'eth0'
>
> config 'interface' 'mesh'
> option 'type' 'bridge'
> option 'ifname' 'ath0 bat0'
> option 'proto' 'static'
> option 'ipaddr' '10.18.1.101'
> option 'netmask' '255.255.255.0'
>
> config 'interface' 'vpn'
> option 'proto' 'none'
> option 'ifname' 'tap0'
>
> ---------------
> /etc/conf/wireless
> ---------------
> config wifi-device wifi0
> option type atheros
> option channel 6
>
> config wifi-iface
> option device wifi0
> option mode ahdemo
> option bssid 02:CA:FF:EE:BA:BE
>
> config wifi-iface
> option device wifi0
> option mode ap
> option ssid oldenburg.freifunk.net
>
> ---------------
> /etc/conf/batman-adv-kernelland
> ---------------
> config batman-adv-kernelland general
> option interface 'ath1 tap0'
> option originator_interval
> option log_level
>
> thanks
> Floh1111
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
2010-04-02 6:52 ` Linus Lüssing
@ 2010-04-02 10:17 ` Clemens John
2010-04-02 11:50 ` Linus Lüssing
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Clemens John @ 2010-04-02 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 8429 bytes --]
On Friday 02 April 2010 08:52:29 Linus Lüssing wrote:
> Hi Floh1111,
>
> Welcome to the B.A.T.M.A.N. mailing list :).
Thank you :)
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 12:54:02AM +0200, Clemens John wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I use batman advanced ("# batctl o" says "B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 0.2.1-beta
> > r1578") on OpenWrt trunk and I have the following problem:
> >
> > I have a wlan meshnetwork in ahdemo mode which uses batman. The
> > meshnetwork is used by clients without batman and therefore I have
> > another network on the same wifi device in ad mode which is bridged with
> > bat0.
> > The bridge is in the network 10.18.1.0/24.
> >
> > I think its like described in
> > http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv-quick- start-guide
>
> Yes, this configuration looks quite good already if I didn't miss
> anything and if you're having wifi cards with an atheros chip.
> What kind of devices are you using?
I use Fonera and Dlink Dir300 wich have a atheros chip inside.
> > The problem is, that I have a vpn network on tap0 (10.18.0.0/24) and I
> > dont know how I can link this two networks/interfaces to each other with
> > batman. I tried to assign tap0 to batman, but this doesnt work.
> >
> > I want to be able to ping hosts that uses batman in the vpn and in the
> > wlan network. How can I do this?
>
> Ok, now I have some more questions already :). What do you want to
> gain with this vpn exactly, merging a couple of mesh clouds or
> getting the network behind the vpn into the mesh? What is
> creating this vpn right now, how are the two sites connected with
> each other (over network identified with 'lan' I guess?).
> Does pinging inside of the vpn itself without any mesh work?
Yes the vpn network is created over lan.
The VPN is created by an central openvpn server in tap mode and ping inside
the vpn works without batman.
The VPN is used to connect several mesh clouds which can´t sea each other
wireless.
Ping from one Mesh device to another meshdevice on the other side of the vpn
tunnel works. I think because they are both in the 10.18.1.0/24 network.
But the devices which are connected to the vpn network have a ip from
10.18.0.0/24 and should also be reachable from the 10.18.1.0/24 (wlan) network
and this doesnt work so far.
I can ping the mac adresses inside the vpn from the wlan network with batctl
but not with normal ipv4 ping.
> From the configuration now, it looks like you're having another
> batman-adv on the other side of the vpn as you've assigned tap0 to
> batman. So keep in mind that the recipient on the other side of the tunnel
> will get batman-adv ethernet frames only which encapsulate the
> payload - there has to be a batman-adv on the other side to unwrap
> the IP packets again.
> And if there is a batman-adv on the other side of the tunnel, make
> sure the vpn itself is transporting whole ethernet frames and not
> only ip packets (in tinc this is "switched" mode for instance or
> in OpenVPN having "dev tap" and not "dev tun").
Yes the setup is like you describe it.
I just give you an output of my devices on a Dir300 connected to vpn and wlan.
Maybe this can be usefull for you.
root@OpenWrt:~# ifconfig
ath0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:55
inet6 addr: fe80::224:1ff:fe17:b755/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:367 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:25573 (24.9 KiB)
ath1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 06:24:01:17:B7:55
inet6 addr: fe80::424:1ff:fe17:b755/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:4979 errors:0 dropped:85 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2736 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:359248 (350.8 KiB) TX bytes:224416 (219.1 KiB)
bat0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 3A:53:93:D9:7D:15
inet6 addr: fe80::3853:93ff:fed9:7d15/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1476 Metric:1
RX packets:586 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:168 errors:0 dropped:15 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:34784 (33.9 KiB) TX bytes:27239 (26.6 KiB)
br-mesh Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:55
inet addr:10.18.1.101 Bcast:10.18.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::bca2:f0ff:fe00:96c8/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:586 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:176 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:34784 (33.9 KiB) TX bytes:28219 (27.5 KiB)
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:56
inet addr:192.168.178.59 Bcast:192.168.178.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::224:1ff:fe17:b756/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:12931 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:3442 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:1952051 (1.8 MiB) TX bytes:454599 (443.9 KiB)
Interrupt:4 Base address:0x1000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:486 (486.0 B) TX bytes:486 (486.0 B)
tap0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 8E:61:AE:E8:03:4A
inet addr:10.18.0.8 Bcast:10.18.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::8c61:aeff:fee8:34a/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:11484 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2232 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:726488 (709.4 KiB) TX bytes:164026 (160.1 KiB)
wifi0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-24-01-17-
B7-55-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:13256 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:197
TX packets:3131 errors:8 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:195
RX bytes:1887585 (1.7 MiB) TX bytes:321699 (314.1 KiB)
Interrupt:3 Memory:b0000000-b000ffff
> > My configs look like this:
> >
> > ---------------
> > /etc/conf/network
> > ---------------
> > config 'interface' 'loopback'
> >
> > option 'ifname' 'lo'
> > option 'proto' 'static'
> > option 'ipaddr' '127.0.0.1'
> > option 'netmask' '255.0.0.0'
> >
> > config 'interface' 'lan'
> >
> > option 'proto' 'dhcp'
> > option 'ifname' 'eth0'
> >
> > config 'interface' 'mesh'
> >
> > option 'type' 'bridge'
> > option 'ifname' 'ath0 bat0'
> > option 'proto' 'static'
> > option 'ipaddr' '10.18.1.101'
> > option 'netmask' '255.255.255.0'
> >
> > config 'interface' 'vpn'
> >
> > option 'proto' 'none'
> > option 'ifname' 'tap0'
> >
> > ---------------
> > /etc/conf/wireless
> > ---------------
> > config wifi-device wifi0
> >
> > option type atheros
> > option channel 6
> >
> > config wifi-iface
> >
> > option device wifi0
> > option mode ahdemo
> > option bssid 02:CA:FF:EE:BA:BE
> >
> > config wifi-iface
> >
> > option device wifi0
> > option mode ap
> > option ssid oldenburg.freifunk.net
> >
> > ---------------
> > /etc/conf/batman-adv-kernelland
> > ---------------
> > config batman-adv-kernelland general
> >
> > option interface 'ath1 tap0'
> > option originator_interval
> > option log_level
> >
> > thanks
> > Floh1111
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
2010-04-02 10:17 ` Clemens John
@ 2010-04-02 11:50 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-04-02 12:27 ` Clemens John
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Linus Lüssing @ 2010-04-02 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8605 bytes --]
> I use Fonera and Dlink Dir300 wich have a atheros chip inside.
Ah, great, those Dlink routers are the ones I'm using here too :).
> Yes the vpn network is created over lan.
> The VPN is created by an central openvpn server in tap mode and ping inside
> the vpn works without batman.
> The VPN is used to connect several mesh clouds which can´t sea each other
> wireless.
> Ping from one Mesh device to another meshdevice on the other side of the vpn
> tunnel works. I think because they are both in the 10.18.1.0/24 network.
>
> But the devices which are connected to the vpn network have a ip from
> 10.18.0.0/24 and should also be reachable from the 10.18.1.0/24 (wlan) network
> and this doesnt work so far.
Yes, you're right, if a host has a /24 subnet and wants to be able
to reach another host on a different /24 subnet, then they need an
extra (default) route entry in their routing table. In your setup,
why aren't you just using a /16 subnet instead if you want them to
reach each other over direct links without any routing?
> I can ping the mac adresses inside the vpn from the wlan network with batctl
> but not with normal ipv4 ping.
>
> > From the configuration now, it looks like you're having another
> > batman-adv on the other side of the vpn as you've assigned tap0 to
> > batman. So keep in mind that the recipient on the other side of the tunnel
> > will get batman-adv ethernet frames only which encapsulate the
> > payload - there has to be a batman-adv on the other side to unwrap
> > the IP packets again.
> > And if there is a batman-adv on the other side of the tunnel, make
> > sure the vpn itself is transporting whole ethernet frames and not
> > only ip packets (in tinc this is "switched" mode for instance or
> > in OpenVPN having "dev tap" and not "dev tun").
>
> Yes the setup is like you describe it.
Ups, ok, sooo, you want the complex stuff :)? Just want to note,
that this has not extensively been tested yet, I had just tried it
here with a friend and this test for one tunnel worked unexpectetly
good. However, we don't know yet if there might occure some
undesired things in larger scales. But if you are up to an
adventure and want to share your experiences with this, great :).
I think I'll better write a little description and article in our
wiki about how our test setup looks like as there seem to be some more
people getting interested in it.
And I also want to point out, that establishing such vpn inter
cloud links with the routers themselves has the following
downside: With tinc + those DIR300 routers, we measured a maximum
total throughput of 300kB/s which might be or might not be what
you are looking for. This is because VPN software is copying the
data from kernel to userspace and back a couple of times. Haven't
measured anything with OpenVPN though, but as far as I know they
are also doing this copying (there is no kernel module for OpenVPN
afaik).
Cheers, Linus
>
> I just give you an output of my devices on a Dir300 connected to vpn and wlan.
> Maybe this can be usefull for you.
>
> root@OpenWrt:~# ifconfig
> ath0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:55
> inet6 addr: fe80::224:1ff:fe17:b755/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:367 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:25573 (24.9 KiB)
>
> ath1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 06:24:01:17:B7:55
> inet6 addr: fe80::424:1ff:fe17:b755/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:4979 errors:0 dropped:85 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:2736 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:359248 (350.8 KiB) TX bytes:224416 (219.1 KiB)
>
> bat0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 3A:53:93:D9:7D:15
> inet6 addr: fe80::3853:93ff:fed9:7d15/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1476 Metric:1
> RX packets:586 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:168 errors:0 dropped:15 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> RX bytes:34784 (33.9 KiB) TX bytes:27239 (26.6 KiB)
>
> br-mesh Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:55
> inet addr:10.18.1.101 Bcast:10.18.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> inet6 addr: fe80::bca2:f0ff:fe00:96c8/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:586 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:176 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:34784 (33.9 KiB) TX bytes:28219 (27.5 KiB)
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:56
> inet addr:192.168.178.59 Bcast:192.168.178.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> inet6 addr: fe80::224:1ff:fe17:b756/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:12931 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:3442 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> RX bytes:1952051 (1.8 MiB) TX bytes:454599 (443.9 KiB)
> Interrupt:4 Base address:0x1000
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
> RX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:486 (486.0 B) TX bytes:486 (486.0 B)
>
> tap0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 8E:61:AE:E8:03:4A
> inet addr:10.18.0.8 Bcast:10.18.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> inet6 addr: fe80::8c61:aeff:fee8:34a/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:11484 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:2232 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> RX bytes:726488 (709.4 KiB) TX bytes:164026 (160.1 KiB)
>
> wifi0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-24-01-17-
> B7-55-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:13256 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:197
> TX packets:3131 errors:8 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:195
> RX bytes:1887585 (1.7 MiB) TX bytes:321699 (314.1 KiB)
> Interrupt:3 Memory:b0000000-b000ffff
>
> > > My configs look like this:
> > >
> > > ---------------
> > > /etc/conf/network
> > > ---------------
> > > config 'interface' 'loopback'
> > >
> > > option 'ifname' 'lo'
> > > option 'proto' 'static'
> > > option 'ipaddr' '127.0.0.1'
> > > option 'netmask' '255.0.0.0'
> > >
> > > config 'interface' 'lan'
> > >
> > > option 'proto' 'dhcp'
> > > option 'ifname' 'eth0'
> > >
> > > config 'interface' 'mesh'
> > >
> > > option 'type' 'bridge'
> > > option 'ifname' 'ath0 bat0'
> > > option 'proto' 'static'
> > > option 'ipaddr' '10.18.1.101'
> > > option 'netmask' '255.255.255.0'
> > >
> > > config 'interface' 'vpn'
> > >
> > > option 'proto' 'none'
> > > option 'ifname' 'tap0'
> > >
> > > ---------------
> > > /etc/conf/wireless
> > > ---------------
> > > config wifi-device wifi0
> > >
> > > option type atheros
> > > option channel 6
> > >
> > > config wifi-iface
> > >
> > > option device wifi0
> > > option mode ahdemo
> > > option bssid 02:CA:FF:EE:BA:BE
> > >
> > > config wifi-iface
> > >
> > > option device wifi0
> > > option mode ap
> > > option ssid oldenburg.freifunk.net
> > >
> > > ---------------
> > > /etc/conf/batman-adv-kernelland
> > > ---------------
> > > config batman-adv-kernelland general
> > >
> > > option interface 'ath1 tap0'
> > > option originator_interval
> > > option log_level
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > Floh1111
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
2010-04-02 11:50 ` Linus Lüssing
@ 2010-04-02 12:27 ` Clemens John
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Clemens John @ 2010-04-02 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 3788 bytes --]
On Friday 02 April 2010 13:50:32 Linus Lüssing wrote:
> > I use Fonera and Dlink Dir300 wich have a atheros chip inside.
>
> Ah, great, those Dlink routers are the ones I'm using here too :).
hehe
> > Yes the vpn network is created over lan.
> > The VPN is created by an central openvpn server in tap mode and ping
> > inside the vpn works without batman.
> > The VPN is used to connect several mesh clouds which can´t sea each other
> > wireless.
> > Ping from one Mesh device to another meshdevice on the other side of the
> > vpn tunnel works. I think because they are both in the 10.18.1.0/24
> > network.
> >
> > But the devices which are connected to the vpn network have a ip from
> > 10.18.0.0/24 and should also be reachable from the 10.18.1.0/24 (wlan)
> > network and this doesnt work so far.
>
> Yes, you're right, if a host has a /24 subnet and wants to be able
> to reach another host on a different /24 subnet, then they need an
> extra (default) route entry in their routing table. In your setup,
> why aren't you just using a /16 subnet instead if you want them to
> reach each other over direct links without any routing?
I don´t exactly know why we are using different subnets, because I´m not verry
familiar with networks.
But I think it is, because we have different projects in our network with
different vpn/24 subnets and wlan/24 subnets which should all be able to be
connected to a bigger network.
Olsr did this routing entrys by default I think. What can I do to make batman
do this automatically too or is this just completely the wrong way?
How are you doing this and how is this done in other networks?
> > I can ping the mac adresses inside the vpn from the wlan network with
> > batctl but not with normal ipv4 ping.
> >
> > > From the configuration now, it looks like you're having another
> > > batman-adv on the other side of the vpn as you've assigned tap0 to
> > > batman. So keep in mind that the recipient on the other side of the
> > > tunnel will get batman-adv ethernet frames only which encapsulate the
> > > payload - there has to be a batman-adv on the other side to unwrap the
> > > IP packets again.
> > > And if there is a batman-adv on the other side of the tunnel, make
> > > sure the vpn itself is transporting whole ethernet frames and not
> > > only ip packets (in tinc this is "switched" mode for instance or
> > > in OpenVPN having "dev tap" and not "dev tun").
> >
> > Yes the setup is like you describe it.
>
> Ups, ok, sooo, you want the complex stuff :)? Just want to note,
> that this has not extensively been tested yet, I had just tried it
> here with a friend and this test for one tunnel worked unexpectetly
> good. However, we don't know yet if there might occure some
> undesired things in larger scales. But if you are up to an
> adventure and want to share your experiences with this, great :).
>
> I think I'll better write a little description and article in our
> wiki about how our test setup looks like as there seem to be some more
> people getting interested in it.
It would be great if you would send me the link when the article is ready.
> And I also want to point out, that establishing such vpn inter
> cloud links with the routers themselves has the following
> downside: With tinc + those DIR300 routers, we measured a maximum
> total throughput of 300kB/s which might be or might not be what
> you are looking for. This is because VPN software is copying the
> data from kernel to userspace and back a couple of times. Haven't
> measured anything with OpenVPN though, but as far as I know they
> are also doing this copying (there is no kernel module for OpenVPN
> afaik).
>
> Cheers, Linus
Tanks, Floh1111
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
2010-04-01 22:54 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv Clemens John
2010-04-02 6:52 ` Linus Lüssing
@ 2010-04-02 16:00 ` Marek Lindner
2010-04-02 16:25 ` Bjoern Franke
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Marek Lindner @ 2010-04-02 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
Hi,
> The problem is, that I have a vpn network on tap0 (10.18.0.0/24) and I
> dont know how I can link this two networks/interfaces to each other with
> batman. I tried to assign tap0 to batman, but this doesnt work.
>
> I want to be able to ping hosts that uses batman in the vpn and in the
> wlan network. How can I do this?
I have been reading the other mails but I don't fully understand what you are
trying to achieve here. Nevertheless, I'll try to write something. If I got it
all wrong, please let me know. :-)
It is important to keep in mind that IP addresses are totally irrelevant to
make this setup work. I mention this since you seem to have experience with
layer 3 routing. Even if the tap interfaces had no IP addresses batman-adv
would route the traffic through. Unless you need to access services on the VPN
interfaces via IPs you can safely run them without.
If you IP networks don't share the same broadcast domain (e.g. 10.18.1.0/24 vs
10.18.0.0/24) batman-adv won't propate IP routing entries because it assumes
that is what you want. To resolve this you have 2 choices:
The easy way:
Move all nodes into the same broadcast domain. All nodes will be able to
communicate with each other without problems. Disadvantage: If you have many
nodes (100+) in close range it will create considerable (ethernet) broadcast
overhead.
The routing way:
Let your VPN nodes know how to reach to "other" IP networks by adding routing
entries. Naturally, this will reduce the broadcast overhead but requires a
mechanism to distribute the routes (as batman-adv won't do it for you). There
a couple of standard ways you can choose from. Depending on your setup & needs
one or the other might be more interesting to use which brings us back to my
initial question. :-)
Regards,
Marek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
2010-04-02 16:00 ` Marek Lindner
@ 2010-04-02 16:25 ` Bjoern Franke
2010-04-03 4:54 ` Marek Lindner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bjoern Franke @ 2010-04-02 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
>
> I have been reading the other mails but I don't fully understand what you are
> trying to achieve here. Nevertheless, I'll try to write something. If I got it
> all wrong, please let me know. :-)
Thanks :)
> It is important to keep in mind that IP addresses are totally irrelevant to
> make this setup work. I mention this since you seem to have experience with
> layer 3 routing. Even if the tap interfaces had no IP addresses batman-adv
> would route the traffic through. Unless you need to access services on the VPN
> interfaces via IPs you can safely run them without.
We have a openvpn with tap running to connect our clouds.
> If you IP networks don't share the same broadcast domain (e.g. 10.18.1.0/24 vs
> 10.18.0.0/24) batman-adv won't propate IP routing entries because it assumes
> that is what you want. To resolve this you have 2 choices:
>
> The easy way:
> Move all nodes into the same broadcast domain. All nodes will be able to
> communicate with each other without problems. Disadvantage: If you have many
> nodes (100+) in close range it will create considerable (ethernet) broadcast
> overhead.
100+? It would be just nice if we would have 10 ;) We had the /16-setup
running with olsrd with a big overhead.
> The routing way:
> Let your VPN nodes know how to reach to "other" IP networks by adding routing
> entries. Naturally, this will reduce the broadcast overhead but requires a
> mechanism to distribute the routes (as batman-adv won't do it for you). There
> a couple of standard ways you can choose from. Depending on your setup & needs
> one or the other might be more interesting to use which brings us back to my
> initial question. :-)
Which ways are you thinking of?
Our initial problem is:
- - several node-clouds, connected via openvpn
- - these nodes also use the vpn as a gateway in the world wide web
- - the gateway also monitores the nodes, so it must be able to access the
nodes, but it runs in openvz VE, so the kernelland-module is not usable
tia
bjo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAku2GmwACgkQazwuXcm17aqtmQCfaBtn1YuBsbBW3+QEufLvGIaS
9IUAn1MtA89jCa0NlpeyZQRSltQkiGNF
=POZN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
2010-04-02 16:25 ` Bjoern Franke
@ 2010-04-03 4:54 ` Marek Lindner
2010-04-04 15:41 ` Clemens John
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Marek Lindner @ 2010-04-03 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
On Saturday 03 April 2010 00:25:21 Bjoern Franke wrote:
> Which ways are you thinking of?
>
> Our initial problem is:
> - several node-clouds, connected via openvpn
> - these nodes also use the vpn as a gateway in the world wide web
> - the gateway also monitores the nodes, so it must be able to access the
> nodes, but it runs in openvz VE, so the kernelland-module is not usable
Ok, since your setup is rather small I would suggest going with the easiest
solution possible. I'm always a big fan of making little steps that work well
instead of aiming for the big goal which you never reach because you die in
the process of getting there.
In a classical batman-adv setup the router(s) with the internet connection run
a DHCP server and provide IPs/default route/etc for all the nodes & wifi-
clients in range.
To connect the VPNs I see 2 feasible approaches:
* You run batman-adv over the VPN which will bring some overhead since the
routing messages will be relayed over the VPN. Depending on the number of
nodes this may or may not be an issue. To keep things simple all nodes run in
the same IP address space.
* Alternatively you can route over the VPN network. The tap0 interface would
not be added to batman-adv. Instead each VPN endpoint needs routing entries
(over tap0) to the other clouds which you can propagate by pushing the routes
from the openvpn server. Each cloud should have its own IP address space.
Regards,
Marek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
2010-04-03 4:54 ` Marek Lindner
@ 2010-04-04 15:41 ` Clemens John
2010-04-04 15:54 ` Marek Lindner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Clemens John @ 2010-04-04 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 6076 bytes --]
On Saturday 03 April 2010 06:54:02 Marek Lindner wrote:
> Ok, since your setup is rather small I would suggest going with the easiest
> solution possible. I'm always a big fan of making little steps that work
> well instead of aiming for the big goal which you never reach because you
> die in the process of getting there.
>
> In a classical batman-adv setup the router(s) with the internet connection
> run a DHCP server and provide IPs/default route/etc for all the nodes &
> wifi- clients in range.
>
> To connect the VPNs I see 2 feasible approaches:
> * You run batman-adv over the VPN which will bring some overhead since the
> routing messages will be relayed over the VPN. Depending on the number of
> nodes this may or may not be an issue. To keep things simple all nodes run
> in the same IP address space.
We decided to keep it simple for testing. We changed the netmasks of all ip
adresses (VPN and Wifi) from /24 to /16 but it doesnt work.
I can see all Nodes with
# batctl o
but not with ping.
-------------
root@OpenWrt:~# cat /etc/config/network
config 'interface' 'loopback'
option 'ifname' 'lo'
option 'proto' 'static'
option 'ipaddr' '127.0.0.1'
option 'netmask' '255.0.0.0'
config 'interface' 'lan'
option 'proto' 'dhcp'
option 'ifname' 'eth0'
config 'interface' 'mesh'
option 'type' 'bridge'
option 'ifname' 'ath0 bat0'
option 'proto' 'static'
option 'ipaddr' '10.18.1.1'
option 'netmask' '255.255.0.0'
-------------
root@OpenWrt:~# ifconfig
ath0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:55
inet6 addr: fe80::224:1ff:fe17:b755/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:28 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:2324 (2.2 KiB)
ath1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 06:24:01:17:B7:55
inet6 addr: fe80::424:1ff:fe17:b755/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:580 errors:0 dropped:18 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:337 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:18512 (18.0 KiB) TX bytes:17574 (17.1 KiB)
bat0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 9A:14:E1:3B:F4:88
inet6 addr: fe80::9814:e1ff:fe3b:f488/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1476 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:16 errors:0 dropped:16 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:944 (944.0 B)
br-mesh Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:55
inet addr:10.18.1.101 Bcast:10.18.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
inet6 addr: fe80::ec23:2fff:fe06:37f3/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:25 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:2034 (1.9 KiB)
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:56
inet addr:192.168.178.59 Bcast:192.168.178.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::224:1ff:fe17:b756/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:3782 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:791 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:533232 (520.7 KiB) TX bytes:93762 (91.5 KiB)
Interrupt:4 Base address:0x1000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:19 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:19 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:1958 (1.9 KiB) TX bytes:1958 (1.9 KiB)
tap0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 42:49:50:CF:69:3E
inet addr:10.18.0.8 Bcast:10.18.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
inet6 addr: fe80::4049:50ff:fecf:693e/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:402 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:31752 (31.0 KiB) TX bytes:368 (368.0 B)
wifi0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-24-01-17-
B7-55-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:5172 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:424
TX packets:374 errors:1 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:195
RX bytes:716632 (699.8 KiB) TX bytes:29035 (28.3 KiB)
Interrupt:3 Memory:b0000000-b000ffff
-------------
root@OpenWrt:~# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.178.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
10.18.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 br-mesh
10.18.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 tap0
default 192.168.178.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
-------------
root@OpenWrt:~# traceroute 10.18.0.3
traceroute to 10.18.0.3 (10.18.0.3), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 10.18.1.101 (10.18.1.101) 3002.434 ms !H 3010.472 ms !H 3009.891 ms !H
10.18.0.3 is a vpn node (tap0) and running batman-adv but traceroute thinks,
that it can be connected on the mesh-bridge???
I can´t figure out his problem. Hopefully someone of you can help me.
Greetings
Floh1111
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
2010-04-04 15:41 ` Clemens John
@ 2010-04-04 15:54 ` Marek Lindner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Marek Lindner @ 2010-04-04 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
On Sunday 04 April 2010 23:41:52 Clemens John wrote:
> root@OpenWrt:~# route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> 192.168.178.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> eth0
> 10.18.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0
> br-mesh
> 10.18.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0
> tap0 default 192.168.178.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
> eth0
Which interfaces did you add to batman-adv ? I guess ath1 & tap0 ?
Can you please post "batctl if" just to be sure ?!
If you added tap0 you should not "use" this interface directly anymore (don't
assign IP address, etc). batman-adv behaves like an ordinary bridge - all
bridged interfaces are to be ignored. Only the bridge interface itself (bat0
in our case) can be used.
Regards,
Marek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-04 15:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-01 22:54 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv Clemens John
2010-04-02 6:52 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-04-02 10:17 ` Clemens John
2010-04-02 11:50 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-04-02 12:27 ` Clemens John
2010-04-02 16:00 ` Marek Lindner
2010-04-02 16:25 ` Bjoern Franke
2010-04-03 4:54 ` Marek Lindner
2010-04-04 15:41 ` Clemens John
2010-04-04 15:54 ` Marek Lindner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox