public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
@ 2010-04-01 22:54 Clemens John
  2010-04-02  6:52 ` Linus Lüssing
  2010-04-02 16:00 ` Marek Lindner
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Clemens John @ 2010-04-01 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: b.a.t.m.a.n

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2105 bytes --]

Hi,

I use batman advanced ("# batctl o" says "B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 0.2.1-beta r1578") 
on OpenWrt trunk and I have the following problem:

I have a wlan meshnetwork in ahdemo mode which uses batman. The meshnetwork is 
used by clients without batman and therefore I have another network on the 
same wifi device in ad mode which is bridged with bat0.
The bridge is in the network 10.18.1.0/24.

I think its like described in http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv-quick-
start-guide

The problem is, that I have a vpn network on tap0 (10.18.0.0/24) and I dont 
know how I can link this two networks/interfaces to each other with batman.
I tried to assign tap0 to batman, but this doesnt work.

I want to be able to ping hosts that uses batman in the vpn and in the wlan 
network. How can I do this?

My configs look like this:

---------------
/etc/conf/network
---------------
config 'interface' 'loopback'
        option 'ifname' 'lo'
        option 'proto' 'static'
        option 'ipaddr' '127.0.0.1'
        option 'netmask' '255.0.0.0'

config 'interface' 'lan'
        option 'proto' 'dhcp'
        option 'ifname' 'eth0'

config 'interface' 'mesh'
        option 'type' 'bridge'
        option 'ifname' 'ath0 bat0'
        option 'proto' 'static'
        option 'ipaddr' '10.18.1.101'
        option 'netmask' '255.255.255.0'

config 'interface' 'vpn'
        option 'proto' 'none'
        option 'ifname' 'tap0'

---------------
/etc/conf/wireless
---------------
config wifi-device  wifi0
        option type     atheros
        option channel  6

config wifi-iface
        option device   wifi0
        option mode     ahdemo
        option bssid    02:CA:FF:EE:BA:BE

config wifi-iface
        option device   wifi0
        option mode     ap
        option ssid     oldenburg.freifunk.net

---------------
/etc/conf/batman-adv-kernelland
---------------
config batman-adv-kernelland general
        option interface                'ath1 tap0'
        option originator_interval
        option log_level

thanks
Floh1111

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
  2010-04-01 22:54 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv Clemens John
@ 2010-04-02  6:52 ` Linus Lüssing
  2010-04-02 10:17   ` Clemens John
  2010-04-02 16:00 ` Marek Lindner
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Linus Lüssing @ 2010-04-02  6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3564 bytes --]

Hi Floh1111,

Welcome to the B.A.T.M.A.N. mailing list :).

On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 12:54:02AM +0200, Clemens John wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I use batman advanced ("# batctl o" says "B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 0.2.1-beta r1578") 
> on OpenWrt trunk and I have the following problem:
> 
> I have a wlan meshnetwork in ahdemo mode which uses batman. The meshnetwork is 
> used by clients without batman and therefore I have another network on the 
> same wifi device in ad mode which is bridged with bat0.
> The bridge is in the network 10.18.1.0/24.
> 
> I think its like described in http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv-quick-
> start-guide
Yes, this configuration looks quite good already if I didn't miss
anything and if you're having wifi cards with an atheros chip.
What kind of devices are you using?
> 
> The problem is, that I have a vpn network on tap0 (10.18.0.0/24) and I dont 
> know how I can link this two networks/interfaces to each other with batman.
> I tried to assign tap0 to batman, but this doesnt work.
> 
> I want to be able to ping hosts that uses batman in the vpn and in the wlan 
> network. How can I do this?
Ok, now I have some more questions already :). What do you want to
gain with this vpn exactly, merging a couple of mesh clouds or
getting the network behind the vpn into the mesh? What is
creating this vpn right now, how are the two sites connected with
each other (over network identified with 'lan' I guess?).
Does pinging inside of the vpn itself without any mesh work?

From the configuration now, it looks like you're having another
batman-adv on the other side of the vpn as you've assigned tap0 to
batman. So keep in mind that the recipient on the other side of the tunnel
will get batman-adv ethernet frames only which encapsulate the
payload - there has to be a batman-adv on the other side to unwrap
the IP packets again.
And if there is a batman-adv on the other side of the tunnel, make
sure the vpn itself is transporting whole ethernet frames and not
only ip packets (in tinc this is "switched" mode for instance or
in OpenVPN having "dev tap" and not "dev tun").

Cheers, Linus

> 
> My configs look like this:
> 
> ---------------
> /etc/conf/network
> ---------------
> config 'interface' 'loopback'
>         option 'ifname' 'lo'
>         option 'proto' 'static'
>         option 'ipaddr' '127.0.0.1'
>         option 'netmask' '255.0.0.0'
> 
> config 'interface' 'lan'
>         option 'proto' 'dhcp'
>         option 'ifname' 'eth0'
> 
> config 'interface' 'mesh'
>         option 'type' 'bridge'
>         option 'ifname' 'ath0 bat0'
>         option 'proto' 'static'
>         option 'ipaddr' '10.18.1.101'
>         option 'netmask' '255.255.255.0'
> 
> config 'interface' 'vpn'
>         option 'proto' 'none'
>         option 'ifname' 'tap0'
> 
> ---------------
> /etc/conf/wireless
> ---------------
> config wifi-device  wifi0
>         option type     atheros
>         option channel  6
> 
> config wifi-iface
>         option device   wifi0
>         option mode     ahdemo
>         option bssid    02:CA:FF:EE:BA:BE
> 
> config wifi-iface
>         option device   wifi0
>         option mode     ap
>         option ssid     oldenburg.freifunk.net
> 
> ---------------
> /etc/conf/batman-adv-kernelland
> ---------------
> config batman-adv-kernelland general
>         option interface                'ath1 tap0'
>         option originator_interval
>         option log_level
> 
> thanks
> Floh1111



[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
  2010-04-02  6:52 ` Linus Lüssing
@ 2010-04-02 10:17   ` Clemens John
  2010-04-02 11:50     ` Linus Lüssing
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Clemens John @ 2010-04-02 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 8429 bytes --]

On Friday 02 April 2010 08:52:29 Linus Lüssing wrote:
> Hi Floh1111,
> 
> Welcome to the B.A.T.M.A.N. mailing list :).

Thank you :)

> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 12:54:02AM +0200, Clemens John wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I use batman advanced ("# batctl o" says "B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 0.2.1-beta
> > r1578") on OpenWrt trunk and I have the following problem:
> > 
> > I have a wlan meshnetwork in ahdemo mode which uses batman. The
> > meshnetwork is used by clients without batman and therefore I have
> > another network on the same wifi device in ad mode which is bridged with
> > bat0.
> > The bridge is in the network 10.18.1.0/24.
> > 
> > I think its like described in
> > http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv-quick- start-guide
> 
> Yes, this configuration looks quite good already if I didn't miss
> anything and if you're having wifi cards with an atheros chip.
> What kind of devices are you using?

I use Fonera and Dlink Dir300 wich have a atheros chip inside.

> > The problem is, that I have a vpn network on tap0 (10.18.0.0/24) and I
> > dont know how I can link this two networks/interfaces to each other with
> > batman. I tried to assign tap0 to batman, but this doesnt work.
> > 
> > I want to be able to ping hosts that uses batman in the vpn and in the
> > wlan network. How can I do this?
> 
> Ok, now I have some more questions already :). What do you want to
> gain with this vpn exactly, merging a couple of mesh clouds or
> getting the network behind the vpn into the mesh? What is
> creating this vpn right now, how are the two sites connected with
> each other (over network identified with 'lan' I guess?).
> Does pinging inside of the vpn itself without any mesh work?

Yes the vpn network is created over lan.
The VPN is created by an central openvpn server in tap mode and ping inside 
the vpn works without batman.
The VPN is used to connect several mesh clouds which can´t sea each other 
wireless.
Ping from one Mesh device to another meshdevice on the other side of the vpn 
tunnel works. I think because they are both in the 10.18.1.0/24 network.

But the devices which are connected to the vpn network have a ip from 
10.18.0.0/24 and should also be reachable from the 10.18.1.0/24 (wlan) network 
and this doesnt work so far.
I can ping the mac adresses inside the vpn from the wlan network with batctl 
but not with normal ipv4 ping.

> From the configuration now, it looks like you're having another
> batman-adv on the other side of the vpn as you've assigned tap0 to
> batman. So keep in mind that the recipient on the other side of the tunnel
> will get batman-adv ethernet frames only which encapsulate the
> payload - there has to be a batman-adv on the other side to unwrap
> the IP packets again.
> And if there is a batman-adv on the other side of the tunnel, make
> sure the vpn itself is transporting whole ethernet frames and not
> only ip packets (in tinc this is "switched" mode for instance or
> in OpenVPN having "dev tap" and not "dev tun").

Yes the setup is like you describe it. 

I just give you an output of my devices on a Dir300 connected to vpn and wlan.
Maybe this can be usefull for you.

root@OpenWrt:~# ifconfig 
ath0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:55  
          inet6 addr: fe80::224:1ff:fe17:b755/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:367 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:25573 (24.9 KiB)

ath1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 06:24:01:17:B7:55  
          inet6 addr: fe80::424:1ff:fe17:b755/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:4979 errors:0 dropped:85 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:2736 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
          RX bytes:359248 (350.8 KiB)  TX bytes:224416 (219.1 KiB)

bat0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 3A:53:93:D9:7D:15  
          inet6 addr: fe80::3853:93ff:fed9:7d15/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1476  Metric:1
          RX packets:586 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:168 errors:0 dropped:15 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
          RX bytes:34784 (33.9 KiB)  TX bytes:27239 (26.6 KiB)

br-mesh   Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:55  
          inet addr:10.18.1.101  Bcast:10.18.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::bca2:f0ff:fe00:96c8/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:586 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:176 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
          RX bytes:34784 (33.9 KiB)  TX bytes:28219 (27.5 KiB)

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:56  
          inet addr:192.168.178.59  Bcast:192.168.178.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::224:1ff:fe17:b756/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:12931 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:3442 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
          RX bytes:1952051 (1.8 MiB)  TX bytes:454599 (443.9 KiB)
          Interrupt:4 Base address:0x1000 

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback  
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
          RX bytes:486 (486.0 B)  TX bytes:486 (486.0 B)

tap0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 8E:61:AE:E8:03:4A  
          inet addr:10.18.0.8  Bcast:10.18.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::8c61:aeff:fee8:34a/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:11484 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:2232 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 
          RX bytes:726488 (709.4 KiB)  TX bytes:164026 (160.1 KiB)

wifi0     Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr 00-24-01-17-
B7-55-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00  
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:13256 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:197
          TX packets:3131 errors:8 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:195 
          RX bytes:1887585 (1.7 MiB)  TX bytes:321699 (314.1 KiB)
          Interrupt:3 Memory:b0000000-b000ffff 

> > My configs look like this:
> > 
> > ---------------
> > /etc/conf/network
> > ---------------
> > config 'interface' 'loopback'
> > 
> >         option 'ifname' 'lo'
> >         option 'proto' 'static'
> >         option 'ipaddr' '127.0.0.1'
> >         option 'netmask' '255.0.0.0'
> > 
> > config 'interface' 'lan'
> > 
> >         option 'proto' 'dhcp'
> >         option 'ifname' 'eth0'
> > 
> > config 'interface' 'mesh'
> > 
> >         option 'type' 'bridge'
> >         option 'ifname' 'ath0 bat0'
> >         option 'proto' 'static'
> >         option 'ipaddr' '10.18.1.101'
> >         option 'netmask' '255.255.255.0'
> > 
> > config 'interface' 'vpn'
> > 
> >         option 'proto' 'none'
> >         option 'ifname' 'tap0'
> > 
> > ---------------
> > /etc/conf/wireless
> > ---------------
> > config wifi-device  wifi0
> > 
> >         option type     atheros
> >         option channel  6
> > 
> > config wifi-iface
> > 
> >         option device   wifi0
> >         option mode     ahdemo
> >         option bssid    02:CA:FF:EE:BA:BE
> > 
> > config wifi-iface
> > 
> >         option device   wifi0
> >         option mode     ap
> >         option ssid     oldenburg.freifunk.net
> > 
> > ---------------
> > /etc/conf/batman-adv-kernelland
> > ---------------
> > config batman-adv-kernelland general
> > 
> >         option interface                'ath1 tap0'
> >         option originator_interval
> >         option log_level
> > 
> > thanks
> > Floh1111

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
  2010-04-02 10:17   ` Clemens John
@ 2010-04-02 11:50     ` Linus Lüssing
  2010-04-02 12:27       ` Clemens John
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Linus Lüssing @ 2010-04-02 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8605 bytes --]

> I use Fonera and Dlink Dir300 wich have a atheros chip inside.
Ah, great, those Dlink routers are the ones I'm using here too :).

> Yes the vpn network is created over lan.
> The VPN is created by an central openvpn server in tap mode and ping inside 
> the vpn works without batman.
> The VPN is used to connect several mesh clouds which can´t sea each other 
> wireless.
> Ping from one Mesh device to another meshdevice on the other side of the vpn 
> tunnel works. I think because they are both in the 10.18.1.0/24 network.
> 
> But the devices which are connected to the vpn network have a ip from 
> 10.18.0.0/24 and should also be reachable from the 10.18.1.0/24 (wlan) network 
> and this doesnt work so far.
Yes, you're right, if a host has a /24 subnet and wants to be able
to reach another host on a different /24 subnet, then they need an
extra (default) route entry in their routing table. In your setup,
why aren't you just using a /16 subnet instead if you want them to
reach each other over direct links without any routing?
> I can ping the mac adresses inside the vpn from the wlan network with batctl 
> but not with normal ipv4 ping.
> 
> > From the configuration now, it looks like you're having another
> > batman-adv on the other side of the vpn as you've assigned tap0 to
> > batman. So keep in mind that the recipient on the other side of the tunnel
> > will get batman-adv ethernet frames only which encapsulate the
> > payload - there has to be a batman-adv on the other side to unwrap
> > the IP packets again.
> > And if there is a batman-adv on the other side of the tunnel, make
> > sure the vpn itself is transporting whole ethernet frames and not
> > only ip packets (in tinc this is "switched" mode for instance or
> > in OpenVPN having "dev tap" and not "dev tun").
> 
> Yes the setup is like you describe it. 
Ups, ok, sooo, you want the complex stuff :)? Just want to note,
that this has not extensively been tested yet, I had just tried it
here with a friend and this test for one tunnel worked unexpectetly
good. However, we don't know yet if there might occure some
undesired things in larger scales. But if you are up to an
adventure and want to share your experiences with this, great :).

I think I'll better write a little description and article in our
wiki about how our test setup looks like as there seem to be some more
people getting interested in it.

And I also want to point out, that establishing such vpn inter
cloud links with the routers themselves has the following
downside: With tinc + those DIR300 routers, we measured a maximum
total throughput of 300kB/s which might be or might not be what
you are looking for. This is because VPN software is copying the
data from kernel to userspace and back a couple of times. Haven't
measured anything with OpenVPN though, but as far as I know they
are also doing this copying (there is no kernel module for OpenVPN
afaik).

Cheers, Linus

> 
> I just give you an output of my devices on a Dir300 connected to vpn and wlan.
> Maybe this can be usefull for you.
> 
> root@OpenWrt:~# ifconfig 
> ath0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:55  
>           inet6 addr: fe80::224:1ff:fe17:b755/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:367 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:25573 (24.9 KiB)
> 
> ath1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 06:24:01:17:B7:55  
>           inet6 addr: fe80::424:1ff:fe17:b755/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:4979 errors:0 dropped:85 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:2736 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
>           RX bytes:359248 (350.8 KiB)  TX bytes:224416 (219.1 KiB)
> 
> bat0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 3A:53:93:D9:7D:15  
>           inet6 addr: fe80::3853:93ff:fed9:7d15/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1476  Metric:1
>           RX packets:586 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:168 errors:0 dropped:15 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
>           RX bytes:34784 (33.9 KiB)  TX bytes:27239 (26.6 KiB)
> 
> br-mesh   Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:55  
>           inet addr:10.18.1.101  Bcast:10.18.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::bca2:f0ff:fe00:96c8/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:586 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:176 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
>           RX bytes:34784 (33.9 KiB)  TX bytes:28219 (27.5 KiB)
> 
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:56  
>           inet addr:192.168.178.59  Bcast:192.168.178.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::224:1ff:fe17:b756/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:12931 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:3442 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
>           RX bytes:1952051 (1.8 MiB)  TX bytes:454599 (443.9 KiB)
>           Interrupt:4 Base address:0x1000 
> 
> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback  
>           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>           inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
>           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>           RX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
>           RX bytes:486 (486.0 B)  TX bytes:486 (486.0 B)
> 
> tap0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 8E:61:AE:E8:03:4A  
>           inet addr:10.18.0.8  Bcast:10.18.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::8c61:aeff:fee8:34a/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:11484 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:2232 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 
>           RX bytes:726488 (709.4 KiB)  TX bytes:164026 (160.1 KiB)
> 
> wifi0     Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr 00-24-01-17-
> B7-55-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00  
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:13256 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:197
>           TX packets:3131 errors:8 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:195 
>           RX bytes:1887585 (1.7 MiB)  TX bytes:321699 (314.1 KiB)
>           Interrupt:3 Memory:b0000000-b000ffff 
> 
> > > My configs look like this:
> > > 
> > > ---------------
> > > /etc/conf/network
> > > ---------------
> > > config 'interface' 'loopback'
> > > 
> > >         option 'ifname' 'lo'
> > >         option 'proto' 'static'
> > >         option 'ipaddr' '127.0.0.1'
> > >         option 'netmask' '255.0.0.0'
> > > 
> > > config 'interface' 'lan'
> > > 
> > >         option 'proto' 'dhcp'
> > >         option 'ifname' 'eth0'
> > > 
> > > config 'interface' 'mesh'
> > > 
> > >         option 'type' 'bridge'
> > >         option 'ifname' 'ath0 bat0'
> > >         option 'proto' 'static'
> > >         option 'ipaddr' '10.18.1.101'
> > >         option 'netmask' '255.255.255.0'
> > > 
> > > config 'interface' 'vpn'
> > > 
> > >         option 'proto' 'none'
> > >         option 'ifname' 'tap0'
> > > 
> > > ---------------
> > > /etc/conf/wireless
> > > ---------------
> > > config wifi-device  wifi0
> > > 
> > >         option type     atheros
> > >         option channel  6
> > > 
> > > config wifi-iface
> > > 
> > >         option device   wifi0
> > >         option mode     ahdemo
> > >         option bssid    02:CA:FF:EE:BA:BE
> > > 
> > > config wifi-iface
> > > 
> > >         option device   wifi0
> > >         option mode     ap
> > >         option ssid     oldenburg.freifunk.net
> > > 
> > > ---------------
> > > /etc/conf/batman-adv-kernelland
> > > ---------------
> > > config batman-adv-kernelland general
> > > 
> > >         option interface                'ath1 tap0'
> > >         option originator_interval
> > >         option log_level
> > > 
> > > thanks
> > > Floh1111



[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
  2010-04-02 11:50     ` Linus Lüssing
@ 2010-04-02 12:27       ` Clemens John
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Clemens John @ 2010-04-02 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 3788 bytes --]

On Friday 02 April 2010 13:50:32 Linus Lüssing wrote:
> > I use Fonera and Dlink Dir300 wich have a atheros chip inside.
> 
> Ah, great, those Dlink routers are the ones I'm using here too :).

hehe

> > Yes the vpn network is created over lan.
> > The VPN is created by an central openvpn server in tap mode and ping
> > inside the vpn works without batman.
> > The VPN is used to connect several mesh clouds which can´t sea each other
> > wireless.
> > Ping from one Mesh device to another meshdevice on the other side of the
> > vpn tunnel works. I think because they are both in the 10.18.1.0/24
> > network.
> > 
> > But the devices which are connected to the vpn network have a ip from
> > 10.18.0.0/24 and should also be reachable from the 10.18.1.0/24 (wlan)
> > network and this doesnt work so far.
> 
> Yes, you're right, if a host has a /24 subnet and wants to be able
> to reach another host on a different /24 subnet, then they need an
> extra (default) route entry in their routing table. In your setup,
> why aren't you just using a /16 subnet instead if you want them to
> reach each other over direct links without any routing?

I don´t exactly know why we are using different subnets, because I´m not verry 
familiar with networks.
But I think it is, because we have different projects in our network with 
different vpn/24 subnets and wlan/24 subnets which should all be able to be 
connected to a bigger network.
Olsr did this routing entrys by default I think. What can I do to make batman 
do this automatically too or is this just completely the wrong way?

How are you doing this and how is this done in other networks?

> > I can ping the mac adresses inside the vpn from the wlan network with
> > batctl but not with normal ipv4 ping.
> > 
> > > From the configuration now, it looks like you're having another
> > > batman-adv on the other side of the vpn as you've assigned tap0 to
> > > batman. So keep in mind that the recipient on the other side of the
> > > tunnel will get batman-adv ethernet frames only which encapsulate the
> > > payload - there has to be a batman-adv on the other side to unwrap the
> > > IP packets again.
> > > And if there is a batman-adv on the other side of the tunnel, make
> > > sure the vpn itself is transporting whole ethernet frames and not
> > > only ip packets (in tinc this is "switched" mode for instance or
> > > in OpenVPN having "dev tap" and not "dev tun").
> > 
> > Yes the setup is like you describe it.
> 
> Ups, ok, sooo, you want the complex stuff :)? Just want to note,
> that this has not extensively been tested yet, I had just tried it
> here with a friend and this test for one tunnel worked unexpectetly
> good. However, we don't know yet if there might occure some
> undesired things in larger scales. But if you are up to an
> adventure and want to share your experiences with this, great :).
> 
> I think I'll better write a little description and article in our
> wiki about how our test setup looks like as there seem to be some more
> people getting interested in it.

It would be great if you would send me the link when the article is ready.

> And I also want to point out, that establishing such vpn inter
> cloud links with the routers themselves has the following
> downside: With tinc + those DIR300 routers, we measured a maximum
> total throughput of 300kB/s which might be or might not be what
> you are looking for. This is because VPN software is copying the
> data from kernel to userspace and back a couple of times. Haven't
> measured anything with OpenVPN though, but as far as I know they
> are also doing this copying (there is no kernel module for OpenVPN
> afaik).
> 
> Cheers, Linus

Tanks, Floh1111

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
  2010-04-01 22:54 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv Clemens John
  2010-04-02  6:52 ` Linus Lüssing
@ 2010-04-02 16:00 ` Marek Lindner
  2010-04-02 16:25   ` Bjoern Franke
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Marek Lindner @ 2010-04-02 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking


Hi,

> The problem is, that I have a vpn network on tap0 (10.18.0.0/24) and I
>  dont  know how I can link this two networks/interfaces to each other with
>  batman. I tried to assign tap0 to batman, but this doesnt work.
> 
> I want to be able to ping hosts that uses batman in the vpn and in the
>  wlan  network. How can I do this?

I have been reading the other mails but I don't fully understand what you are 
trying to achieve here. Nevertheless, I'll try to write something. If I got it 
all wrong, please let me know.  :-)

It is important to keep in mind that IP addresses are totally irrelevant to 
make this setup work. I mention this since you seem to have experience with 
layer 3 routing. Even if the tap interfaces had no IP addresses batman-adv 
would route the traffic through. Unless you need to access services on the VPN 
interfaces via IPs you can safely run them without.

If you IP networks don't share the same broadcast domain (e.g. 10.18.1.0/24 vs 
10.18.0.0/24) batman-adv won't propate IP routing entries because it assumes 
that is what you want. To resolve this you have 2 choices:

The easy way:
Move all nodes into the same broadcast domain. All nodes will be able to 
communicate with each other without problems. Disadvantage: If you have many 
nodes (100+) in close range it will create considerable (ethernet) broadcast 
overhead.

The routing way:
Let your VPN nodes know how to reach to "other" IP networks by adding routing 
entries. Naturally, this will reduce the broadcast overhead but requires a 
mechanism to distribute the routes (as batman-adv won't do it for you). There 
a couple of standard ways you can choose from. Depending on your setup & needs 
one or the other might be more interesting to use which brings us back to my 
initial question.  :-)

Regards,
Marek

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
  2010-04-02 16:00 ` Marek Lindner
@ 2010-04-02 16:25   ` Bjoern Franke
  2010-04-03  4:54     ` Marek Lindner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bjoern Franke @ 2010-04-02 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

> 
> I have been reading the other mails but I don't fully understand what you are 
> trying to achieve here. Nevertheless, I'll try to write something. If I got it 
> all wrong, please let me know.  :-)

Thanks :)

> It is important to keep in mind that IP addresses are totally irrelevant to 
> make this setup work. I mention this since you seem to have experience with 
> layer 3 routing. Even if the tap interfaces had no IP addresses batman-adv 
> would route the traffic through. Unless you need to access services on the VPN 
> interfaces via IPs you can safely run them without.

We have a openvpn with tap running to connect our clouds.

> If you IP networks don't share the same broadcast domain (e.g. 10.18.1.0/24 vs 
> 10.18.0.0/24) batman-adv won't propate IP routing entries because it assumes 
> that is what you want. To resolve this you have 2 choices:
> 
> The easy way:
> Move all nodes into the same broadcast domain. All nodes will be able to 
> communicate with each other without problems. Disadvantage: If you have many 
> nodes (100+) in close range it will create considerable (ethernet) broadcast 
> overhead.

100+? It would be just nice if we would have 10 ;) We had the /16-setup
running with olsrd with a big overhead.

> The routing way:
> Let your VPN nodes know how to reach to "other" IP networks by adding routing 
> entries. Naturally, this will reduce the broadcast overhead but requires a 
> mechanism to distribute the routes (as batman-adv won't do it for you). There 
> a couple of standard ways you can choose from. Depending on your setup & needs 
> one or the other might be more interesting to use which brings us back to my 
> initial question.  :-)

Which ways are you thinking of?

Our initial problem is:
- - several node-clouds, connected via openvpn
- - these nodes also use the vpn as a gateway in the world wide web
- - the gateway also monitores the nodes, so it must be able to access the
nodes, but it runs in openvz VE, so the kernelland-module is not usable

tia
bjo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAku2GmwACgkQazwuXcm17aqtmQCfaBtn1YuBsbBW3+QEufLvGIaS
9IUAn1MtA89jCa0NlpeyZQRSltQkiGNF
=POZN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
  2010-04-02 16:25   ` Bjoern Franke
@ 2010-04-03  4:54     ` Marek Lindner
  2010-04-04 15:41       ` Clemens John
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Marek Lindner @ 2010-04-03  4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking

On Saturday 03 April 2010 00:25:21 Bjoern Franke wrote:
> Which ways are you thinking of?
> 
> Our initial problem is:
> - several node-clouds, connected via openvpn
> - these nodes also use the vpn as a gateway in the world wide web
> - the gateway also monitores the nodes, so it must be able to access the
> nodes, but it runs in openvz VE, so the kernelland-module is not usable

Ok, since your setup is rather small I would suggest going with the easiest 
solution possible. I'm always a big fan of making little steps that work well 
instead of aiming for the big goal which you never reach because you die in 
the process of getting there.

In a classical batman-adv setup the router(s) with the internet connection run 
a DHCP server and provide IPs/default route/etc for all the nodes & wifi-
clients in range. 

To connect the VPNs I see 2 feasible approaches:
* You run batman-adv over the VPN which will bring some overhead since the 
routing messages will be relayed over the VPN. Depending on the number of 
nodes this may or may not be an issue. To keep things simple all nodes run in 
the same IP address space.
* Alternatively you can route over the VPN network. The tap0 interface would 
not be added to batman-adv. Instead each VPN endpoint needs routing entries 
(over tap0) to the other clouds which you can propagate by pushing the routes 
from the openvpn server. Each cloud should have its own IP address space.

Regards,
Marek

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
  2010-04-03  4:54     ` Marek Lindner
@ 2010-04-04 15:41       ` Clemens John
  2010-04-04 15:54         ` Marek Lindner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Clemens John @ 2010-04-04 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 6076 bytes --]

On Saturday 03 April 2010 06:54:02 Marek Lindner wrote:
> Ok, since your setup is rather small I would suggest going with the easiest
> solution possible. I'm always a big fan of making little steps that work
> well instead of aiming for the big goal which you never reach because you
> die in the process of getting there.
> 
> In a classical batman-adv setup the router(s) with the internet connection
> run a DHCP server and provide IPs/default route/etc for all the nodes &
> wifi- clients in range.
> 
> To connect the VPNs I see 2 feasible approaches:
> * You run batman-adv over the VPN which will bring some overhead since the
> routing messages will be relayed over the VPN. Depending on the number of
> nodes this may or may not be an issue. To keep things simple all nodes run
> in the same IP address space.

We decided to keep it simple for testing. We changed the netmasks of all ip 
adresses (VPN and Wifi) from /24 to /16 but it doesnt work.

I can see all Nodes with
# batctl o

but not with ping.

-------------
root@OpenWrt:~# cat /etc/config/network 
config 'interface' 'loopback'
        option 'ifname' 'lo'
        option 'proto' 'static'
        option 'ipaddr' '127.0.0.1'
        option 'netmask' '255.0.0.0'

config 'interface' 'lan'
        option 'proto' 'dhcp'
        option 'ifname' 'eth0'

config 'interface' 'mesh'
        option 'type' 'bridge'
        option 'ifname' 'ath0 bat0'
        option 'proto' 'static'
        option 'ipaddr' '10.18.1.1'
        option 'netmask' '255.255.0.0'


-------------
root@OpenWrt:~# ifconfig 
ath0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:55  
          inet6 addr: fe80::224:1ff:fe17:b755/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:28 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:2324 (2.2 KiB)

ath1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 06:24:01:17:B7:55  
          inet6 addr: fe80::424:1ff:fe17:b755/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:580 errors:0 dropped:18 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:337 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
          RX bytes:18512 (18.0 KiB)  TX bytes:17574 (17.1 KiB)

bat0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 9A:14:E1:3B:F4:88  
          inet6 addr: fe80::9814:e1ff:fe3b:f488/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1476  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:16 errors:0 dropped:16 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:944 (944.0 B)

br-mesh   Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:55  
          inet addr:10.18.1.101  Bcast:10.18.255.255  Mask:255.255.0.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::ec23:2fff:fe06:37f3/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:25 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:2034 (1.9 KiB)

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:24:01:17:B7:56  
          inet addr:192.168.178.59  Bcast:192.168.178.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::224:1ff:fe17:b756/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:3782 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:791 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
          RX bytes:533232 (520.7 KiB)  TX bytes:93762 (91.5 KiB)
          Interrupt:4 Base address:0x1000 

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback  
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:19 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:19 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
          RX bytes:1958 (1.9 KiB)  TX bytes:1958 (1.9 KiB)

tap0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 42:49:50:CF:69:3E  
          inet addr:10.18.0.8  Bcast:10.18.255.255  Mask:255.255.0.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::4049:50ff:fecf:693e/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:402 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 
          RX bytes:31752 (31.0 KiB)  TX bytes:368 (368.0 B)

wifi0     Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr 00-24-01-17-
B7-55-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00  
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:5172 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:424
          TX packets:374 errors:1 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:195 
          RX bytes:716632 (699.8 KiB)  TX bytes:29035 (28.3 KiB)
          Interrupt:3 Memory:b0000000-b000ffff 

-------------
root@OpenWrt:~# route 
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
192.168.178.0   *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0
10.18.0.0       *               255.255.0.0     U     0      0       0 br-mesh
10.18.0.0       *               255.255.0.0     U     0      0        0 tap0
default         192.168.178.1   0.0.0.0         UG    0      0   0 eth0

-------------
root@OpenWrt:~# traceroute 10.18.0.3
traceroute to 10.18.0.3 (10.18.0.3), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
 1  10.18.1.101 (10.18.1.101)  3002.434 ms !H  3010.472 ms !H  3009.891 ms !H

10.18.0.3 is a vpn node (tap0) and running batman-adv but traceroute thinks, 
that it can be connected on the mesh-bridge???

I can´t figure out his problem. Hopefully someone of you can help me.

Greetings
Floh1111

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv
  2010-04-04 15:41       ` Clemens John
@ 2010-04-04 15:54         ` Marek Lindner
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Marek Lindner @ 2010-04-04 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking

On Sunday 04 April 2010 23:41:52 Clemens John wrote:
> root@OpenWrt:~# route 
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
>  Iface
>  192.168.178.0   *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0
>  eth0
>  10.18.0.0       *               255.255.0.0     U     0      0       0
>  br-mesh
>  10.18.0.0       *               255.255.0.0     U     0      0        0
>  tap0 default         192.168.178.1   0.0.0.0         UG    0      0   0
>  eth0

Which interfaces did you add to batman-adv ? I guess ath1 & tap0 ?
Can you please post "batctl if" just to be sure ?!

If you added tap0 you should not "use" this interface directly anymore (don't 
assign IP address, etc). batman-adv behaves like an ordinary bridge - all 
bridged interfaces are to be ignored. Only the bridge interface itself (bat0 
in our case) can be used. 

Regards,
Marek

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-04 15:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-01 22:54 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problems connecting VPN and WLAN with Batman-adv Clemens John
2010-04-02  6:52 ` Linus Lüssing
2010-04-02 10:17   ` Clemens John
2010-04-02 11:50     ` Linus Lüssing
2010-04-02 12:27       ` Clemens John
2010-04-02 16:00 ` Marek Lindner
2010-04-02 16:25   ` Bjoern Franke
2010-04-03  4:54     ` Marek Lindner
2010-04-04 15:41       ` Clemens John
2010-04-04 15:54         ` Marek Lindner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox