From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 23:30:15 +0800 References: <20100527162350.75bef379@rechenknecht> <20100527150700.GA29869@lunn.ch> In-Reply-To: <20100527150700.GA29869@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201005272330.15388.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Layer 2 fragmentation Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Thursday 27 May 2010 23:07:00 Andrew Lunn wrote: > I don't quite understand the problem. If you have implemented > fragmentation, you will naturally increase the MTU on bat0 so that it > is the standard for Ethernet. So this statement will not trigger. AFAIK batman-adv determines the minimal MTU automatically, so that you can't simply increase the mtu on bat0. But you are right - if the fragmentation is enabled batman-adv could allow higher mtu values. Cheers, Marek