From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Sven Eckelmann Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:15:35 +0200 References: <20100627172416.62e7554d@rechenknecht> In-Reply-To: <20100627172416.62e7554d@rechenknecht> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2364451.NxtxFzjxer"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006271815.37040.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] PATCH fragmentation of unicast packets Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org --nextPart2364451.NxtxFzjxer Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andreas Langer wrote: > If fragmentation is on, the mtu of the bat interface will be set to 1500 > and bigger packets will be splitted in two parts. The receiver stores the > packets in a buffer list for each originator, which will be created with > the first fragmented packet. For this handling i added a sequenznumber and > the orig address to the unicast_packet definition. >=20 > regards, > Andreas >=20 > Signed-off-by: Andreas Langer This patch cannot be applied because the mailer added automatically wordwra= ps. Either find a way to forbid such a behavior for your mailer or try to use git-send-email. There are explanations how you do that can be found at http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=3Dblob= ;f=3DDocumentation/email-clients.txt And please try to check your patches with checkpatch.pl from the linux sources. You will notice that you've removed a newline after the function bat_set_rx_csum. This is important because we try to submit those patches to the mainline linux kernel. There are also other styling changes I don't understand. For example a newl= ine before create_neighbor. I haven't checked really more as I couldn't apply i= t. And can you try to add [] around PATCH in the summary line and remove the regards... stuff from the commits message? Otherwise it will be part of the commit message and the patch we send to the kernel folks. =46or more information please read http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=3Dblob= ;f=3DDocumentation/SubmittingPatches Best regards, Sven --nextPart2364451.NxtxFzjxer Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJMJ3koAAoJEF2HCgfBJntGB8MQAIayM92nNh/WVz/S6qXfrgAs RQAN5fnxqgL0/FmuzerCeDKzApQWxoORYIpNmU2uoJhly7WyPJumsGOGWmwT0mf4 4ONkNPBdNLUILjKkVo6KrFjfjRcElPIXcoU2ggPD1FsQEjrCdC3uMK0mHJEDdu9R uWH4M9DIOvoVqzxHjTEs0v6Gwv3nt5g6fyjHYOwTSf5Kfj0WwjqUCyAOynwuUcKA ghRx4/5tK/yCMEQP79oO/d+v1sIJLbJmo8mGGoHppgqWitZEi4ou3ylVSawQ27TH bzLuWnR4G38Hr2SxzF3SqehZmYpi0vZxUWAfxBpmSiwIzw18GCnk3IkvhIW5R7A5 +D/RF0vWj2eALEkdvKTYcwWnWcafHZH3u3mhx7356wp3xWAulk/AJXgn10vR73Sg PAHrRo7cg4IEcrtWHGoVzkdnNof7WjU7dRm/qSYEtNWZX4z5qjcuQNe+mgYETg5N 3Tg93NyBH1l6LCXGyjV1EwpIe0k4HFFk1mmUtDn3TUl6eHYYzosA4PlOX3ka8fGy CSJuWTEULc36+T293FQQ5w5UEL6IPqppUZFbJvoWA4+DYmAT7FNSrMRY/4Z+Klom QPOTMI8+jDYG7/dQrU8baiMiX83kEaodfQ4xCuTGxuQf23eBsIZIIlKRJ+zLUR97 bRU/3jQ2atp372MwfFJe =458N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2364451.NxtxFzjxer--