From: Andreas Langer <an.langer@gmx.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/2] batman-adv: layer2 unicast packet fragmentation
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 20:17:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100706201753.2bcbc369@rechenknecht> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100706173956.GA9429@ritirata.org>
Hi Antonio,
thanks for the question. The timeout came up to my mind just in that moment.
I don't know if 5000/10000 be a better value, has somebody else an opinion
regarding that matter ?
regards,
Andreas
> Hi all, Hi Andreas,
>
> > +#define FRAG_TIMEOUT 60000 /* purge frag list entrys after time in
> > ms */
>
> Why did you choose a so large timeout? Is there a particular reason for
> that?
>
> I think that in 60 seconds an host could receive a very large amount of
> "orphan" packets in case of a bad link causing memory problems.
>
> Could 5000/10000 be a better value?
>
> Regards,
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-06 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-06 15:58 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman adv unicast fragmentation (version 4) Andreas Langer
2010-07-06 15:59 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 1/2] batctl: layer2 unicast packet fragmentation Andreas Langer
2010-07-06 15:59 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/2] batman-adv: " Andreas Langer
2010-07-06 17:07 ` Andrew Lunn
2010-07-06 18:06 ` Andreas Langer
2010-07-06 17:39 ` Antonio Quartulli
2010-07-06 18:17 ` Andreas Langer [this message]
2010-07-06 18:57 ` Andrew Lunn
2010-07-06 19:13 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-07-06 19:50 ` Marek Lindner
2010-07-07 10:40 ` Marek Lindner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-07 17:30 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman adv unicast fragmentation (version 5) Andreas Langer
2010-07-07 17:32 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/2] batman-adv: layer2 unicast packet fragmentation Andreas Langer
2010-07-09 14:51 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-07-05 21:42 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman adv unicast fragmentation (version 3) Andreas Langer
2010-07-05 21:44 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/2] batman-adv: layer2 unicast packet fragmentation Andreas Langer
2010-06-30 18:58 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman adv unicast fragmentation Andreas Langer
2010-06-30 19:00 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/2] batman-adv: layer2 unicast packet fragmentation Andreas Langer
2010-07-05 0:37 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-07-05 12:53 ` Sven Eckelmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100706201753.2bcbc369@rechenknecht \
--to=an.langer@gmx.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox