From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:50:06 +0200 References: <201008121233.46032.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008121250.07216.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Nat Question Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On Thursday 12 August 2010 12:41:41 David Beaumont wrote: > I originally had my MTU values set incorrectly, but believe i have > them correct now > > router with internet > > ath0 - MTU 1524 (physical wifi device) > > router on otherside of mesh > > ath0 - MTU 1524 (physical wifi device) Yes, that looks good. The problems you describe sound like MTU or firewall issues which is why I was asking. > wifi0 - MTU 1500 (should this be 1524 also) You should ignore the wifi0 interface and not include it in any configuration. It is of no relevance in your setup. > I am aware that it is quite an old verison, although this is the > version that is currently in the openwrt repo. I will compile a more > recent version once i have the basics working i think. Ok. > Thanks for you help so far guys, two people have suggested MTU issues > now, so fingers crossed someone can see something wrong with the > output above? Could you post the config of both nodes ? That includes: * ifconfig * brctl show * ip route / route -n * cat /proc/net/batman-adv/interfaces * iptables (-t nat) -vnL [on the internet-router] Regards, Marek