From: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] problem openwrt-trunk + ath5k + batman-adv-devel in my case
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:59:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201008271159.28345.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C7720F1.5030604@bb.banban.jp>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 861 bytes --]
Kazuki Shimada wrote:
[...]
> "exit softif_destroy\n" is not printed out.
> unregister_netdev?
Thanks, perfect work. This is a new bug which was added in the multiple mesh
patchset. The problem is that the rtnl lock is taken and we still use
unregister_netdev when we process an event using hard_if_event.
I have to check other code paths to ensure that I don't destroy other things,
but a workaround for you would be to use unregister_netdevice instead of
unregister_netdev in that situation. (Just check v0.2.1-30-g992bfd1 for more
information on that subject).
The problem is that softif_destroy is also called when we unloading the module
- which means that it assumes that the rtnl lock is taken (which it is not
when you don't use unregister_netdev there). So I will work on a complete fix
and Cc it to you.
Thanks,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-27 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-12 18:04 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problem openWRT "backfire" and "kmod-batman-adv" Tim Glaremin
2010-08-13 3:24 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-08-20 7:29 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] problem openwrt-trunk + ath5k + batman-adv-devel in my case Lemonde
2010-08-20 9:00 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-08-20 16:24 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-20 17:08 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Where do we stand on working systems? Jon Roland
[not found] ` <AANLkTim6yVL8q=fXoFOu23ZBMpqaMHiheCV13-6U99+s@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-20 20:10 ` Jon Roland
2010-08-21 5:01 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] problem openwrt-trunk + ath5k + batman-adv-devel in my case Kazuki Shimada
2010-08-21 6:01 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-26 6:51 ` Kazuki Shimada
2010-08-26 8:28 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-08-27 2:20 ` Kazuki Shimada
2010-08-27 9:59 ` Sven Eckelmann [this message]
2010-08-31 7:03 ` Kazuki Shimada
2010-08-31 9:32 ` Sven Eckelmann
[not found] ` <4C7E22B2.1000707@bb.banban.jp>
2010-09-01 10:48 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-08-31 10:37 ` Marek Lindner
2010-09-01 10:04 ` Kazuki Shimada
2010-08-14 17:26 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problem openWRT "backfire" and "kmod-batman-adv" Marek Lindner
2010-08-16 16:51 ` Marek Lindner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201008271159.28345.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
--to=sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox