public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Linus Lüssing" <linus.luessing@web.de>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Always synchronize rcu's on module shutdown
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 12:09:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100906100913.GA13044@Sellars> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100906073046.GA6973@sven-atom.lazhur.ath.cx>

Hi Sven,

synchronize_net already contains a synchronize_rcu at its end, so
the synchronize_rcu in the batman code there has always been
redundant.

I've removed the synchronize_rcu instead of the synchronize_net to
be on the safe side. I guess usually no more packets should arrive
anyway as the batman packet type is not registered anymore. But I
wasn't sure if the might_sleep() of synchronize_net() might be
needed for something, so I didn't dare to remove synchronize_net.

If someone says it'd be ok to remove synchronize_net() instead,
I could make a new patch, no problem.

Cheers, Linus

On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:30:46AM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 01:29:53AM +0200, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> > During the module shutdown procedure in batman_exit(), a rcu callback is
> > being scheduled (batman_exit -> hardif_remove_interfaces ->
> > hardif_remove_interfae -> call_rcu). However, when the kernel unloads
> > the module, the rcu callback might not have been executed yet, resulting
> > in a "unable to handle kernel paging request" in __rcu_process_callback
> > afterwards, causing the kernel to freeze.
> > Therefore, we should always flush all rcu callback functions scheduled
> > during the shutdown procedure.
> 
> I am really irritated by your patch. I would have expected that you add a
> synchronyze_rcu in batman_exit and that was it. Instead I see a synchronize_net
> added and a synchronize_net/-_rcu removed from mesh_free. This doesn't seem to
> match at all. Could you please explain further why it is implemented that way?
> 
> thanks,
> 	Sven



  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-06 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-05 23:29 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Always synchronize rcu's on module shutdown Linus Lüssing
2010-09-06  7:30 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-09-06 10:09   ` Linus Lüssing [this message]
2010-09-06 12:07     ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-09-06 12:37       ` Linus Lüssing
2010-09-06 12:45         ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2] " Sven Eckelmann
2010-09-06 14:09           ` Marek Lindner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100906100913.GA13044@Sellars \
    --to=linus.luessing@web.de \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox